Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759963›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in ophthalmology2015

Emerging techniques for pathogen discovery in endophthalmitis.

Bryan K Hong, Cecilia S Lee, Russell N Van Gelder, Sunir J Garg

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The cereus matter of Bacillus endophthalmitis.Experimental eye research · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bacterial and Fungal Endophthalmitis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017
    Review
  17. Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Classification of Endophthalmitis Versus Uveitis and Lymphoma from Aqueous and Vitreous IL-6 and IL-10 Levels.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2017
    Article
  18. Using MALDI-TOF-MS to testMolecular vision · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan K HongaMid Atlantic Retina, The Retina Service of Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania bThe Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cecilia S Lee
Russell N Van Gelder
Sunir J Garg
University of Washington Medical Center · USWills Eye Hospital · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Diversity and Dynamic Stability of the Ocular Surface MicrobiomeR01EY022038 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHESTOPALOV, VALERY I, VAN GELDER, RUSSELL N. · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
The ocular surface microbiome in potentially infectious ophthalmic diseaseK23EY024921 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, CECILIA SUNGMIN · 2015 to 2019
$991k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY024921NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022038NEI NIH HHS R01EY022038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDespite the inability to detect certain organisms and relatively low yield, microbial culture is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of most intraocular infections. Research on alternative molecular diagnostic methods has produced an array of strategies that augment and improve pathogen detection. This review summarizes the most recent literature on this topic. RECENT

findingsThe yield of traditional microbial culture has not improved since the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study results were published 20 years ago. Advances in PCR methods have enabled quantification of pathogen load and screening for multiple organisms at once. More recently, deep sequencing techniques allow highly sensitive detection of any DNA-based life form in a specimen. This offers the promise of not only improved detection of traditional organisms but can also identify organisms not previously associated with endophthalmitis. SUMMARY: Molecular diagnostic methods enhance the results of microbial culture and may become the new standard in the diagnosis of intraocular infections.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialEndophthalmitisEye InfectionsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaryotypingMetagenomeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionVitreous BodyDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID25759963
PMCPMC4425405
OpenAlexW2325341277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.