Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759811›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015

Promoting Coordinated Development of Community-Based Information Standards for Modeling in Biology: The COMBINE Initiative.

Michael Hucka, David P Nickerson, Gary D Bader, Frank T Bergmann, Jonathan Cooper, Emek Demir, Alan Garny, Martin Golebiewski, Chris J Myers, Falk Schreiber and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2015
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BioPAX in 2024: Where we are and where we are heading.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Beyond the horizon: immersive developments for animal ecology research.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Article
  11. Towards modelling emergence in plant systems.Quantitative plant biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. GraphML-SBGN bidirectional converter for metabolic networks.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael HuckaComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA , USA.
David P NickersonAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
Gary D BaderThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Frank T BergmannComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA , USA ; BioQuant/Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany.
Jonathan CooperDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Emek DemirComputational Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY , USA.
Alan GarnyAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
Martin GolebiewskiScientific Databases and Visualization, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS) , Heidelberg , Germany.
Chris J MyersDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, UT , USA.
Falk SchreiberFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University , Melbourne, VIC , Australia ; Institute of Computer Science, University Halle-Wittenberg , Halle , Germany.
Dagmar WaltemathDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock , Rostock , Germany.
Nicolas Le NovèreBabraham Institute , Cambridge , UK ; European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute , Cambridge , UK.

Funding

The Virtual Physiological Rat ProjectP50GM094503 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2011 to 2015
$11.6M
Continued Support of Essential SBML Software and Community ResourcesR01GM070923 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HUCKA, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2018
$8.0M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0419NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM094503NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE) is a consortium of groups involved in the development of open community standards and formats used in computational modeling in biology. COMBINE's aim is to act as a coordinator, facilitator, and resource for different standardization efforts whose domains of use cover related areas of the computational biology space. In this perspective article, we summarize COMBINE, its general organization, and the community standards and other efforts involved in it. Our goals are to help guide readers toward standards that may be suitable for their research activities, as well as to direct interested readers to relevant communities where they can best expect to receive assistance in how to develop interoperable computational models.

Indexed as

biologycomputational modelingdata sharingfile formatsreproducible sciencestandardization

Identifiers

PMID25759811
PMCPMC4338824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.