Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759809›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2015

Antibiotic Resistance: What are the Opportunities for Primary Care in Alleviating the Crisis?

Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Tammy C Hoffmann, Amanda R McCullough, Mieke L van Driel, Chris B Del Mar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Activity fingerprinting of AMR β-lactamase towards a fast and accurate diagnosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Physicians under Pressure: Evidence from Antibiotics Prescribing in England.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessing the public acceptability of proposed policy interventions to reduce the misuse of antibiotics in Australia: A report on two community juries.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malene Plejdrup HansenCentre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University , Gold Coast, QLD , Australia.
Tammy C HoffmannCentre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University , Gold Coast, QLD , Australia.
Amanda R McCulloughCentre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University , Gold Coast, QLD , Australia.
Mieke L van DrielDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.
Chris B Del MarCentre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University , Gold Coast, QLD , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous opportunities are available in primary care for alleviating the crisis of increasing antibiotic resistance. Preventing patients from developing an acute respiratory infection (ARI) will obviate any need for antibiotic use downstream. Hygiene measures such as physical barriers and hand hygiene, and possibly vaccination and exercise, may be effective. Also, a large range of complementary and alternative medicines (e.g. zinc, vitamin C and probiotics) are proposed for preventing and treating ARIs, but evidence for efficacy is scarce. General practitioners' (GPs) attitudes towards antibiotic prescribing are a major factor in the prescribing for ARIs. Professional interventions with educational components are effective, although they have modest effects, and are expensive. GPs' perceptions - that mistakenly assume as a default that patients want antibiotics for their ARIs - are often wrong. Shared decision making might be a solution, as it enables clinician and patient to participate jointly in making a health decision, having discussed the options together with the evidence for their harms as well as benefits. Furthermore, GPs' diagnostic uncertainty - often leading to an antibiotic prescription "just in case" - might be addressed by exploiting strategies such as safety-netting, e.g., establishing with the patient a priori clearly defined actions to take if the course of the illness deviates from the expected. None of these strategies or interventions on their own will greatly improve the use of antibiotics for ARIs. However, used in concert, combinations are likely to enable clinicians and health care systems to implement the strategies that will reduce antimicrobial resistance in the future.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancebehaviorprescriptionsprimary careprobioticsteroids

Identifiers

PMID25759809
PMCPMC4338603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.