Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759807›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2015

A bioinformatic survey of distribution, conservation, and probable functions of LuxR solo regulators in bacteria.

Sujatha Subramoni, Diana Vanessa Florez Salcedo, Zulma R Suarez-Moreno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiome engineering for bioremediation of emerging pollutants.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. LuxR Solos in the Plant EndophyteApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Temperate Bacteriophages (Prophages) inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Identification of Quorum-Sensing Molecules ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sujatha SubramoniGrupo de Bioprospección, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común Chía, Colombia.
Diana Vanessa Florez SalcedoInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria Bogotá, Colombia.
Zulma R Suarez-MorenoGrupo de Bioprospección, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común Chía, Colombia.
Universidad de La Sabana · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LuxR solo transcriptional regulators contain both an autoinducer binding domain (ABD; N-terminal) and a DNA binding Helix-Turn-Helix domain (HTH; C-terminal), but are not associated with a cognate N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) synthase coding gene in the same genome. Although a few LuxR solos have been characterized, their distributions as well as their role in bacterial signal perception and other processes are poorly understood. In this study we have carried out a systematic survey of distribution of all ABD containing LuxR transcriptional regulators (QS domain LuxRs) available in the InterPro database (IPR005143), and identified those lacking a cognate AHL synthase. These LuxR solos were then analyzed regarding their taxonomical distribution, predicted functions of neighboring genes and the presence of complete AHL-QS systems in the genomes that carry them. Our analyses reveal the presence of one or multiple predicted LuxR solos in many proteobacterial genomes carrying QS domain LuxRs, some of them harboring genes for one or more AHL-QS circuits. The presence of LuxR solos in bacteria occupying diverse environments suggests potential ecological functions for these proteins beyond AHL and interkingdom signaling. Based on gene context and the conservation levels of invariant amino acids of ABD, we have classified LuxR solos into functionally meaningful groups or putative orthologs. Surprisingly, putative LuxR solos were also found in a few non-proteobacterial genomes which are not known to carry AHL-QS systems. Multiple predicted LuxR solos in the same genome appeared to have different levels of conservation of invariant amino acid residues of ABD questioning their binding to AHLs. In summary, this study provides a detailed overview of distribution of LuxR solos and their probable roles in bacteria with genome sequence information.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacteriaComputational BiologyConserved SequenceGenome, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsLuxR autoinducer binding proteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsLuxR solos or orphansorthologsphylogenyQS domain LuxR proteinsquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID25759807
PMCPMC4338825
OpenAlexW2026270171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.