ArticleBiomicrofluidics2015
Enhancing sensitivity and specificity in rare cell capture microdevices with dielectrophoresis.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microscale nonlinear electrokinetics for the analysis of cellular materials in clinical applications: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
- Dielectrophoresis-based microfluidic platforms for cancer diagnostics.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Review
- Automated electrorotation shows electrokinetic separation of pancreatic cancer cells is robust to acquired chemotherapy resistance, serum starvation, and EMT.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Emerging microfluidic devices for cancer cells/biomarkers manipulation and detection.IET nanobiotechnology · 2016Review
- Development of three-dimensional integrated microchannel-electrode system to understand the particles' movement with electrokinetics.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Microfluidic Sample Preparation for Single Cell Analysis.Analytical chemistry · 2016Review
- Enhanced contactless dielectrophoresis enrichment and isolation platform via cell-scale microstructures.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Microfluidic platform for separation and extraction of plasma from whole blood using dielectrophoresis.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
- Alternating current electrohydrodynamics in microsystems: Pushing biomolecules and cells around on surfaces.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Review
- Spatial concentration distribution analysis of cells in electrode-multilayered microchannel by dielectric property measurement.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The capture and subsequent analysis of rare cells, such as circulating tumor cells from a peripheral blood sample, has the potential to advance our understanding and treatment of a wide range of diseases. There is a particular need for high purity (i.e., high specificity) techniques to isolate these cells, reducing the time and cost required for single-cell genetic analyses by decreasing the number of contaminating cells analyzed. Previous work has shown that antibody-based immunocapture can be combined with dielectrophoresis (DEP) to differentially isolate cancer cells from leukocytes in a characterization device. Here, we build on that work by developing numerical simulations that identify microfluidic obstacle array geometries where DEP-immunocapture can be used to maximize the capture of target rare cells, while minimizing the capture of contaminating cells. We consider geometries with electrodes offset from the array and parallel to the fluid flow, maximizing the magnitude of the resulting electric field at the obstacles' leading and trailing edges, and minimizing it at the obstacles' shoulders. This configuration attracts cells with a positive DEP (pDEP) response to the leading edge, where the shear stress is low and residence time is long, resulting in a high capture probability; although these cells are also repelled from the shoulder region, the high local fluid velocity at the shoulder minimizes the impact on the overall transport and capture. Likewise, cells undergoing negative DEP (nDEP) are repelled from regions of high capture probability and attracted to regions where capture is unlikely. These simulations predict that DEP can be used to reduce the probability of capturing contaminating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (using nDEP) from 0.16 to 0.01 while simultaneously increasing the capture of several pancreatic cancer cell lines from 0.03-0.10 to 0.14-0.55, laying the groundwork for the experimental study of hybrid DEP-immunocapture obstacle array microdevices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.