Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759708›Full record

ArticleCerebrovascular diseases extra

Final Results of Cilostazol-Aspirin Therapy against Recurrent Stroke with Intracranial Artery Stenosis (CATHARSIS).

Shinichiro Uchiyama, Nobuyuki Sakai, Sono Toi, Masayuki Ezura, Yasushi Okada, Makoto Takagi, Yoji Nagai, Yoshihiro Matsubara, Kazuo Minematsu, Norihiro Suzuki and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebrovascular diseases extra. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Protocol for Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination (CSPS.com): a randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2015
    Trial
  14. Review
  15. Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Stroke in Asia.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Shinichiro UchiyamaClinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan ; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Sono ToiDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki EzuraDepartment of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Cerebrovascular Center and Clinical Research Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yasushi OkadaNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Makoto TakagiDepartment of Neurology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoji NagaiTranslational Research Informatics Center, Kobe, Japan.
Yoshihiro MatsubaraTranslational Research Informatics Center, Kobe, Japan.
Kazuo MinematsuNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Research Center, Osaka, Japan.
Norihiro SuzukiDepartment of Neurology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio TanahashiInternational Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Waro TakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mie University, Mie, Japan.
Izumi NagataKokura Memorial Hospital, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masayasu MatsumotoDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
CATHARSIS Study Group
Translational Research Informatics Center (Japan) · JPHiroshima University · JPHiroshima University Hospital · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPKeio University · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPMie University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPNational Kyushu Medical Center · JPSaiseikai Central Hospital · JPSaitama International Medical Center · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the effect of cilostazol plus aspirin versus aspirin alone on the progression of intracranial arterial stenosis (IAS), and to compare ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients with symptomatic IAS, an investigator-driven, nationwide multicenter cooperative randomized controlled trial (CATHARSIS; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier 00333164) was conducted.

methods165 noncardioembolic ischemic stroke patients with >50% stenosis in the responsible intracranial artery after 2 weeks to 6 months from the onset were randomly allocated to receive either cilostazol 200 mg/day plus aspirin 100 mg/day (n = 83, CA group) or aspirin 100 mg/day alone (n = 82, A group). The primary endpoint was the progression of IAS on magnetic resonance angiography at 2 years after randomization. Secondary endpoints were any vascular events, any cause of death, serious adverse events, new silent brain infarcts, and worsening of the modified Rankin Scale score.

resultsProgression of IAS was observed in 9.6% of the CA group patients and in 5.6% of the A group patients, with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.53). The incidence of the secondary endpoints tended to be lower in the CA group compared with the A group, although the differences were not significant. By using exploratory logistic regression analysis adjusted for patient background characteristics, it was shown that the risk for certain combinations of secondary endpoints was lower in the CA group than in the A group [all vascular events and silent brain infarcts: odds ratio (OR) = 0.37, p = 0.04; stroke and silent brain infarcts: OR = 0.34, p = 0.04; all vascular events, worsening of modified Rankin Scale scores and silent brain infracts: OR = 0.41, p = 0.03]. Major hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients of the CA group and in 3 of the A group.

conclusionProgression of IAS during the 2-year observation period appears to be less frequent than previously reported in stroke patients on antiplatelet agents after the acute phase, which could be due to the adequate control of risk factors, and because patients with stroke within 2 weeks after the onset were excluded. The results of the CATHARSIS trial suggest a potential utility of pharmacotherapies with cilostazol plus aspirin as well as of strict control of risk factors for the management of symptomatic IAS. Larger studies with higher statistical power are required to obtain conclusive results.

Indexed as

AspirinCilostazolIntracranial arterial stenosisStroke prevention

Identifiers

PMID25759708
PMCPMC4327570
OpenAlexW2019163671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.