Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759470›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2015

Mothers know best: redirecting adolescent reward sensitivity toward safe behavior during risk taking.

Eva H Telzer, Nicholas T Ichien, Yang Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Where You Lead, I Will Follow: Exploring Sibling Similarity in Brain and Behavior During Risky Decision Making.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  14. Neural Correlates of Conflicting Social Influence on Adolescent Risk Taking.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Development of Impulsivity and Sensation Seeking: Associations with Substance Use among At-Risk Adolescents.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Differential Behavioral and Neural Profiles in Youth With Conduct Problems During Risky Decision-Making.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA ehtelzer@illinois.edu.
Nicholas T IchienDepartment of Psychology and.
Yang QuDepartment of Psychology and.

Funding

Incorporating the Social Context into Neurocognitive Models of Adolescent Risk TakingR01DA039923 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being one of the healthiest developmental periods, morbidity and mortality rates increase dramatically during adolescence, largely due to preventable, risky behaviors. Heightened reward sensitivity, coupled with ineffective cognitive control, has been proposed to underlie adolescents' risk taking. In this study, we test whether reward sensitivity can be redirected to promote safe behavior. Adolescents completed a risk-taking task in the presence of their mother and alone during fMRI. Adolescents demonstrated reduced risk-taking behavior when their mothers were present compared with alone, which was associated with greater recruitment of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) when making safe decisions, decreased activation in the ventral striatum following risky decisions and greater functional coupling between the ventral striatum and VLPFC when making safe decisions. Importantly, the very same neural circuitry (i.e. ventral striatum) that has been linked to greater risk-taking can also be redirected toward thoughtful, more deliberative and safe decisions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMothersPrefrontal CortexRewardRisk-TakingVentral StriatumAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleadolescencefamilyfMRIinfluencerewardsrisk taking

Identifiers

PMID25759470
PMCPMC4590537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.