Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25759400›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2015

Early effects of duloxetine on emotion recognition in healthy volunteers.

Susan Bamford, Ian Penton-Voak, Verity Pinkney, David S Baldwin, Marcus R Munafò, Matthew Garner

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan BamfordSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ian Penton-VoakSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Verity PinkneySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
David S BaldwinClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Matthew GarnerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK m.j.garner@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MR/J011754/Medical Research Council MR/J011754/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) duloxetine is an effective treatment for major depression and generalised anxiety disorder. Neuropsychological models of antidepressant drug action suggest therapeutic effects might be mediated by the early correction of maladaptive biases in emotion processing, including the recognition of emotional expressions. Sub-chronic administration of duloxetine (for two weeks) produces adaptive changes in neural circuitry implicated in emotion processing; however, its effects on emotional expression recognition are unknown. Forty healthy participants were randomised to receive either 14 days of duloxetine (60 mg/day, titrated from 30 mg after three days) or matched placebo (with sham titration) in a double-blind, between-groups, repeated-measures design. On day 0 and day 14 participants completed a computerised emotional expression recognition task that measured sensitivity to the six primary emotions. Thirty-eight participants (19 per group) completed their course of tablets and were included in the analysis. Results provide evidence that duloxetine, compared to placebo, may reduce the accurate recognition of sadness. Drug effects were driven by changes in participants' ability to correctly detect subtle expressions of sadness, with greater change observed in the placebo relative to the duloxetine group. These effects occurred in the absence of changes in mood. Our preliminary findings require replication, but complement recent evidence that sadness recognition is a therapeutic target in major depression, and a mechanism through which SNRIs could resolve negative biases in emotion processing to achieve therapeutic effects.

Indexed as

EmotionsSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodDuloxetine HydrochlorideFacial ExpressionFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologySerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsYoung AdultDuloxetine HydrochlorideSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsanxietyDepressionduloxetineemotion recognitionsadness

Identifiers

PMID25759400
PMCPMC4876427
OpenAlexW2007507136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.