Observational studyHealth services research2015
Is Self-Referral Associated with Higher Quality Care?
Observational study in Health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-driven second opinions in oncology: a review.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures within the colorectal cancer care continuum: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Plastic Surgeons Are Underrepresented on Hospital Websites When Searching for Facial Aesthetics Procedures.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Epidemiological aspects of individuals with mental disorders in the referral system: the experience of a Community Mental Health Center in the northeast of Iran.Discover mental health · 2024Article
- Screening tool to improve patient referral to acute surgical care from accident and emergency.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Article
- Capturing What Matters with Patients' Bypass Behavior? Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- How do Patients Access Bariatric Surgery? An Analysis of Referrals to a Large Academic Medical Center.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Quality indicators in lung cancer: a review and analysis.BMJ open quality · 2021Review
- Second opinions in medical oncology.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Does having a usual primary care provider reduce patient self-referrals in rural China's rural multi-tiered medical system? A retrospective study in Qianjiang District, China.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Second opinions from urologists for prostate cancer: Who gets them, why, and their link to treatment.Cancer · 2017Article
- Facilitating Access to Care for Children With Complex Health Needs Through Low-Barrier Place-Based Intake Processes: Lessons From the RICHER Social Pediatric Model.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the extent to which patients self-refer to cancer specialists and whether self-referral is associated with better experiences and quality of care. DATA SOURCES: Data from surveys and medical record abstraction collected through the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. STUDY
designObservational study of patients with lung and colorectal cancer diagnosed from 2003 through 2005 in five geographically defined regions and five integrated health care delivery systems.
methodsMultivariable logistic regression models used to assess factors associated with self-referral and propensity score-weighted doubly robust models to test the association between self-referral and experiences/quality of care. PRINCIPAL
findingsAmong 5,882 patients, 9.7 percent of lung cancer patients and 14.9 percent of colorectal cancer patients self-referred to at least one cancer specialist. Black patients were less likely to self-refer than white patients (odds ratio: 0.48, 95 percent confidence interval: 0.35, 0.64); patients with high incomes (vs. low) and with a college degree (vs. non-high school graduates) were significantly more likely to self-refer. Self-referral was associated with lower ratings of overall physician communication for patients with lung cancer but, conversely, higher odds of curative surgery among patients with stage I/II lung cancer.
conclusionsA small but significant proportion of patients self-referred to their cancer specialists; rates varied by patient race and socioeconomic status. To the extent that self-referral is associated with quality, it may reinforce disparities in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.