Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25758953›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Plastid establishment did not require a chlamydial partner.

Daryl Domman, Matthias Horn, T Martin Embley, Tom A Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cytonuclear integration and co-evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Commentary: Plastid establishment did not require a chlamydial partner.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  18. Endosymbiotic theories for eukaryote origin.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daryl DommanDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias HornDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
T Martin EmbleyInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Tom A WilliamsInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 268701European Research Council 281633Wellcome Trust 045404Wellcome Trust 089803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary plastids descend from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont of an ancient eukaryotic host, but the initial selective drivers that stabilized the association between these two cells are still unclear. One hypothesis that has achieved recent prominence suggests that the first role of the cyanobiont was in energy provision for a host cell whose reserves were being depleted by an intracellular chlamydial pathogen. A pivotal claim is that it was chlamydial proteins themselves that converted otherwise unusable cyanobacterial metabolites into host energy stores. We test this hypothesis by investigating the origins of the key enzymes using sophisticated phylogenetics. Here we show a mosaic origin for the relevant pathway combining genes with host, cyanobacterial or bacterial ancestry, but we detect no strong case for Chlamydiae to host transfer under the best-fitting models. Our conclusion is that there is no compelling evidence from gene trees that Chlamydiae played any role in establishing the primary plastid endosymbiosis.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionCarbohydrate MetabolismChlamydiaCyanobacteriaCyanophoraGene Transfer, HorizontalMembrane Transport ProteinsPhylogenyPlastidsSymbiosisBacterial ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsuhpC protein, bacteria

Identifiers

PMID25758953
PMCPMC4374161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.