Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25758781›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2015

Alterations of DNA repair genes in the NCI-60 cell lines and their predictive value for anticancer drug activity.

Fabricio G Sousa, Renata Matuo, Sai-Wen Tang, Vinodh N Rajapakse, Augustin Luna, Chris Sander, Sudhir Varma, Paul H G Simon, James H Doroshow, William C Reinhold and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functions of Thrombospondin-1 in the Tumor Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Advances in Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Translational Research.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabricio G SousaDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Centro de Estudos em Células Tronco, Terapia Celular e Genética Toxicológica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.
Renata MatuoDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Centro de Estudos em Células Tronco, Terapia Celular e Genética Toxicológica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil.
Sai-Wen TangDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Vinodh N RajapakseDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Augustin LunaDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Computational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Chris SanderComputational Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Sudhir VarmaDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; HiThru Analytics LLC, Laurel, MD 20707, USA.
Paul H G SimonDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
James H DoroshowDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
William C ReinholdDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Yves PommierDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: pommier@nih.gov.
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
DNA Repair, Cell Cycle Checkpoints and Apoptosis as Targets for Anticancer DrugsZIABC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2009 to 2025
$23.0M
MSKCC Center for Translational Cancer Genomic AnalysisU24CA143840 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LADANYI, MARC, SANDER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2016
$11.5M
PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED DNA BREAKS AS INDICATOR OF TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITIONZ01BC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
Comparison of molecular factors to drug activities.ZICBC011509 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI REINHOLD, WILLIAM · 2013 to 2025
$1.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006150NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U24 CA143840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of function of DNA repair (DNAR) genes is associated with genomic instability and cancer predisposition; it also makes cancer cells reliant on a reduced set of DNAR pathways to resist DNA-targeted therapy, which remains the core of the anticancer armamentarium. Because the landscape of DNAR defects across numerous types of cancers and its relation with drug activity have not been systematically examined, we took advantage of the unique drug and genomic databases of the US National Cancer Institute cancer cell lines (the NCI-60) to characterize 260 DNAR genes with respect to deleterious mutations and expression down-regulation; 169 genes exhibited a total of 549 function-affecting alterations, with 39 of them scoring as putative knockouts across 31 cell lines. Those mutations were compared to tumor samples from 12 studies of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE). Based on this compendium of alterations, we determined which DNAR genomic alterations predicted drug response for 20,195 compounds present in the NCI-60 drug database. Among 242 DNA damaging agents, 202 showed associations with at least one DNAR genomic signature. In addition to SLFN11, the Fanconi anemia-scaffolding gene SLX4 (FANCP/BTBD12) stood out among the genes most significantly related with DNA synthesis and topoisomerase inhibitors. Depletion and complementation experiments validated the causal relationship between SLX4 defects and sensitivity to raltitrexed and cytarabine in addition to camptothecin. Therefore, we propose new rational uses for existing anticancer drugs based on a comprehensive analysis of DNAR genomic parameters.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDNA RepairDown-RegulationGenesHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United StatesAntineoplastic AgentsCancerCytarabineDNA repairNCI-60RaltitrexedSLX4/FANCP/BTBD12

Identifiers

PMID25758781
PMCPMC4385398
OpenAlexW2048957676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.