Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25758742›Full record

ReviewDrugs2015

Clinical efficacy and safety of cilostazol: a critical review of the literature.

Kelly C Rogers, Carrie S Oliphant, Shannon W Finks

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Treatment Strategies for the Claudicant.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly C RogersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, 881 Madison Ave, Rm 457, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA, krogers1@uthsc.edu.
Carrie S Oliphant
Shannon W Finks
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USMethodist University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cilostazol is a unique antiplatelet agent that has been commercially available for over two decades. As a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, it reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation yet also possesses vasodilatory and antiproliferative properties. It has been widely studied in a variety of disease states, including peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary artery disease with percutaneous coronary intervention. Overall, cilostazol appears to be a promising agent in the management of these disease states with a bleeding profile comparable to placebo; even when combined with other antiplatelet agents, cilostazol does not appear to increase the rate of bleeding. Despite the possible benefit of cilostazol, its use is limited by tolerability as some patients often report drug discontinuation due to headache, diarrhea, dizziness, or increased heart rate. To date, it has been predominantly studied in the Asian population, making it difficult to extrapolate these results to a more diverse patient population. This paper discusses the evolving role of cilostazol in the treatment of vascular diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsCilostazolHemorrhageHumansIntermittent ClaudicationPeripheral Arterial DiseasePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeCilostazolPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID25758742
OpenAlexW2068471160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.