Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25758258›Full record

Trial reportOrphanet journal of rare diseases2015

A pilot longitudinal study of the use of waxy maize heat modified starch in the treatment of adults with glycogen storage disease type I: a randomized double-blind cross-over study.

Kaustuv Bhattacharya, Helen Mundy, Maggie F Lilburn, Michael P Champion, David W Morley, François Maillot

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Development of minimally invasiveMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaustuv BhattacharyaCharles Dent Metabolic Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, WC1N 3BG, London, UK. Kaustuv.Bhattacharya@health.nsw.gov.au.
Helen MundyEvelina London Children's Hospital; St Thomas's Hospital, SE1 7EH, London, UK. Helen.Mundy@gstt.nhs.uk.
Maggie F LilburnCharles Dent Metabolic Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, WC1N 3BG, London, UK. Maggie.lilburn@btinternet.com.
Michael P ChampionEvelina London Children's Hospital; St Thomas's Hospital, SE1 7EH, London, UK. Michael.Champion@gstt.nhs.uk.
David W MorleyDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Imperial College, SW7 2AZ, London, UK. d.w.morley@gmail.com.
François MaillotCHRU de Tours, 37044, Tours, Cedex, France. francois.maillot@univ-tours.fr.
Evelina London Children's Healthcare · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncooked corn-starch (UCCS) has been the mainstay of therapy for the hepatic glycogen storage diseases (GSD) but is not always effective. A new starch (WMHMS) has demonstrated a more favourable short-term metabolic profile.

objectiveTo determine efficacy and safety of a new uncooked starch (WMHMS) compared to UCCS over 16 weeks treatment with each.

methodA double-blind cross-over study of 10 adults (aged 16 - 38 years, six male) with GSD Ia and Ib. After an individualised fast, subjects were randomised to take a 50 g starch-load of either WMHMS or UCCS. Starch-loads terminated when blood glucose was < 3.0 mmol/L or the subject felt subjectively hypoglycaemic. Anonymous biochemical profiles were assessed by 2 investigators and a starch administration schedule recommended. Each starch was delivered in coded sachets and intake was monitored for the following 16 weeks. After a washout period, the protocol was repeated with the alternative product.

results4 subjects failed to establish therapy on the cross-over limb. Data from 7 paired starch load showed: longer median fasting duration with WMHMS (7.5 versus 5 hours; p = 0.023), slower decrease in the glucose curve (0.357 versus 0.632 mmol/hr p = 0.028) and less area under insulin curves for the first 4 hours (p = 0.03). Two of six subjects took 50% or less WMHMS compared to UCCS and one took more. Plasma triglycerides, cholesterol and uric acid were unchanged after each study phase.

conclusionWMHMS leads to significant reduction in insulin release and reduced starch use in some GSD patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlycogen Storage Disease Type IHumansMalePilot ProjectsStarchYoung AdultBlood GlucoseStarch

Identifiers

PMID25758258
PMCPMC4340332
OpenAlexW2136509011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.