ArticleRheumatology international2015
Staphylococcus aureus sepsis in rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Bacterial Adenylate Kinase mRNA with a Chimeric Antisense Oligonucleotide for Rational Antibacterial Drug Development.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the skin microbial guardians and assailants in psoriasis subtypes: a Mendelian randomization study.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Antirheumatic treatment, disease activity and risk ofRMD open · 2022Article
- Mortality of Sepsis in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis and Comparison With a Control Group.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2021Article
- Risk factors forBMJ open · 2019Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of infection. In this study, we determined the risk of and risk factors for Staphyococcus aureus (S. aureus) sepsis in RA. We assembled a retrospective nested case-control subset of RA patients with S. aureus sepsis from the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Medical Informatics database, confirmed the diagnoses, and collected data electronically and by chart review. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for S. aureus sepsis, with risk expressed as odds ratios (ORs). We extracted data on the length of hospitalization and 30-day and 1-year mortality from the Medical Informatics database for all cases and controls. There were 48 confirmed S. aureus sepsis cases and 232 confirmed controls in the RA cohort. In multivariate analysis, indwelling central venous catheter (OR 15.97; 95 % CI 5.09-50.10; p < 0.01) and congestive heart failure (OR 2.89; 95 % CI 1.26-6.63; p = 0.01) were independently associated with risk of S. aureus sepsis, while treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), both biologic and non-biologic, was not. S. aureus sepsis was associated with increased 30-day and 1-year mortality (OR 7.37; 95 % CI 2.86-19.0; p < 0.01 for 30-day and OR 5.24; 95 % CI 2.51-10.94; p < 0.01 for 1-year mortality) and longer hospitalization (p < 0.01). Treatment with biologic DMARDs was not associated with longer hospitalization (p = 0.89). Indwelling central venous catheters and congestive heart failure increased the risk of S. aureus sepsis in this observational cohort of patients with RA. Treatment with biologic and non-biologic DMARDs did not increase this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.