Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25757949›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

VAlidation of an 8-item-questionnaire predictive for a positive caLprotectin tEst and Real-life implemenTation in primary care to reduce diagnostic delay in inflammatory bowel disease (ALERT): protocol for a prospective diagnostic study.

Susann Hasler, Nadine Zahnd, Salomé Müller, Stephan Vavricka, Gerhard Rogler, Ryan Tandjung, Thomas Rosemann

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susann HaslerInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nadine ZahndIBDnet (http://www.ibdnet.ch), Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland.
Salomé MüllerInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Stephan VavrickaIBDnet (http://www.ibdnet.ch), Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Triemli Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gerhard RoglerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ryan TandjungInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHTriemli Hospital · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in primary healthcare is challenging and often associated with a considerable diagnostic delay. This delay is associated with worse disease progression and outcomes. Although testing for faecal calprotectin is a useful screening tool to identify patients who need endoscopy for IBD, the widespread use may not be appropriate due to the low prevalence of patients with IBD among all patients attending a general practitioner (GP) with gastrointestinal symptoms. To increase the appropriate application of the faecal calprotectin test, an 8-item questionnaire, the CalproQuest, has been developed to increase pretest probability for a positive test result. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective diagnostic trial. The study consists of two independent and consecutive parts A and B, conducted by gastroenterologists (A) and GPs (B), respectively. Patients included in part A are referred to the gastroenterologist for any endoscopic evaluation. Patients included in part B present at their GP because of ongoing unspecific gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, stool irregularities, diarrhoea) for at least 2 weeks. CalproQuest consists of four main and four secondary questions specific for IBD; it is considered positive if ≥2 main criteria are answered positively or one main criterion and two secondary criteria are answered positively. In part A, the sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for stool calprotectin levels ≥50 μg/g faeces and for positive IBD diagnosis will be investigated. In part B, the feasibility of CalproQuest in daily primary healthcare practice will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kanton Zurich (reference KEK-ZH-number 2013-0516). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with the worldwide medical community. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66310845.

Indexed as

Research DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesDelayed DiagnosisFecesGastroenterologyGeneral PracticeHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityValidation Studies as TopicLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexearly diagnosisfeasibilitysensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID25757949
PMCPMC4360837
OpenAlexW2132075155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.