Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2015
Prospective evaluation of regional oxygen saturation to estimate central venous saturation in sepsis.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional cerebral oxygen saturation and postoperative delirium in endovascular surgery: a prospective cohort study.Trials · 2019Observational
- Review
- Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference and the effect of venous hyperoxia: A limiting factor, or an additional marker of severity in shock?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Observational
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: tissue oxygenation and microcirculation.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Review
- Evaluating tissue oxygenation at the bedside: global, regional, or both?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2015Article
- What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? Utility of central venous oxygen saturation to risk stratify septic patients.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current treatment guidelines for sepsis claim an early goal-directed hemodynamic optimization including fluid resuscitation, use of vasopressors and inotropic agents. We investigated the correlation between the prominent treatment goal central venous saturation (ScvO2) and the frontal and the thenar regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured by near infrared spectroscopy. Secondary, we examined the value of ScvO2, lactate levels and rSO2 as surrogate markers of an impaired tissue oxygenation for outcome prediction in sepsis. This prospective, observational study was performed at the surgical intensive care unit of the University Hospital Giessen. A total of 50 patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock were included. ScvO2, rSO2 and lactate were measured at sepsis diagnosis (baseline), 24 and 48 h, thereafter. We investigated the predictive value of frontal and thenar rSO2 for a decreased SvcO2 under 70%. For survivor and non-survivors ScvO2, rSO2 and lactate were analysed. Patients with ScvO2 >70% showed a trend to higher levels of fontal rSO2 (62.81 ± 8.06 vs. 53.54 ± 15.48; p = 0.058). ROC-analysis revealed a minor prediction of a decreased ScvO2 by frontal rSO2 levels at baseline (AUC = 0.687; 95% CI 0.511-0.863; p = 0.047). Combined measurements of lactate and ScvO2 showed significantly elevated mortality for patients with ScvO2 ≥70% and lactate levels ≥2.5 mmol/l (log rank test p = 0.004). In the group with ScvO2 <70% and lactate levels <2.5 mmol/l no patients died during the observation period. Frontal rSO2 correlates with ScvO2 but both frontal and thenar rSO2 do not exactly discriminate between patients with high or low ScvO2 in sepsis. The combination of elevated lactate >2.5 mmol/l and ScvO2 >70 % is highly associated with poor outcome in ICU patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.