Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25757356›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2015

Do Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality and Patient Experience within Medicare Plans Generalize across Measures and Racial/Ethnic Groups?

Robert Weech-Maldonado, Marc N Elliott, John L Adams, Amelia M Haviland, David J Klein, Katrin Hambarsoomian, Carol Edwards, Jacob W Dembosky, Sarah Gaillot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert Weech-MaldonadoDepartment of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Marc N ElliottRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
John L AdamsCenter for Effectiveness and Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA.
Amelia M HavilandH. John Heinz III College of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
David J KleinDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Katrin HambarsoomianRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Carol EdwardsRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Jacob W DemboskyRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sarah GaillotDivision of Consumer Assessment & Plan Performance, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG031054 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CROWTHER, MARTHA R · 2007 to 2025
$11.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG031054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how similar racial/ethnic disparities in clinical quality (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set [HEDIS]) and patient experience (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems [CAHPS]) measures are for different measures within Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

setting5.7 million/492,495 MA beneficiaries with 2008-2009 HEDIS/CAHPS data. STUDY

designBinomial (HEDIS) and linear (CAHPS) hierarchical mixed models generated contract estimates for HEDIS/CAHPS measures for Hispanics, blacks, Asian-Pacific Islanders, and whites. We examine the correlation of within-plan disparities for HEDIS and CAHPS measures across measures. PRINCIPAL

findingsPlans with disparities for a given minority group (vs. whites) for a particular measure have a moderate tendency for similar disparities for other measures of the same type (mean r = 0.51/.21 and 53/34 percent positive and statistically significant for CAHPS/HEDIS). This pattern holds to a lesser extent for correlations of CAHPS disparities and HEDIS disparities (mean r = 0.05/0.14/0.23 and 4.4/5.6/4.4 percent) positive and statistically significant for blacks/Hispanics/API.

conclusionsSimilarities in CAHPS and HEDIS disparities across measures might reflect common structural factors, such as language services or provider incentives, affecting several measures simultaneously. Health plan structural changes might reduce disparities across multiple measures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAsianBenchmarkingBlack or African AmericanEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth StatusHispanic or LatinoHumansCAHPSdisparitiesHEDISMedicarerace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID25757356
PMCPMC4693842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.