Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25756301›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2015

Inoculum selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial substrates.

Jo De Vrieze, Linde Raport, Bernard Willems, Silke Verbrugge, Eveline Volcke, Erik Meers, Largus T Angenent, Nico Boon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jo De VriezeLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent, B-9000, Belgium.
Linde RaportLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent, B-9000, Belgium.
Bernard WillemsInnolab, Derbystraat 223, Sint-Denijs-Westrem, 9051, Belgium.
Silke VerbruggeLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent, B-9000, Belgium.
Eveline VolckeDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent, B-9000, Belgium.
Erik MeersLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Applied Biochemistry, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent, B-9000, Belgium.
Largus T AngenentDepartment of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Nico BoonLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent, B-9000, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining a reliable estimation of the methane potential of organic waste streams in anaerobic digestion, for which a biochemical methane potential (BMP) test is often used, is of high importance. Standardization of this BMP test is required to ensure inter-laboratory repeatability and accuracy of the BMP results. Therefore, guidelines were set out; yet, these do not provide sufficient information concerning origin of and the microbial community in the test inoculum. Here, the specific contribution of the methanogenic community on the BMP test results was evaluated. The biomethane potential of four different substrates (molasses, bio-refinery waste, liquid manure and high-rate activated sludge) was determined by means of four different inocula from full-scale anaerobic digestion plants. A significant effect of the selected inoculum on the BMP result was observed for two out of four substrates. This inoculum effect could be attributed to the abundance of methanogens and a potential inhibiting effect in the inoculum itself, demonstrating the importance of inoculum selection for BMP testing. We recommend the application of granular sludge as an inoculum, because of its higher methanogenic abundance and activity, and protection from bulk solutions, compared with other inocula.

Indexed as

Microbial ConsortiaWaste ProductsAnaerobiosisBiotransformationManureMethaneMolassesSewageManureMethaneSewageWaste Products

Identifiers

PMID25756301
PMCPMC4554466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.