Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25756038›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2015

Integrating psychosocial care into neuro-oncology: challenges and strategies.

Suzanne K Chambers, Luigi Grassi, Melissa K Hyde, Jimmie Holland, Jeff Dunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Brain cancer patient and support persons' experiences of psychosocial care: a mapping of research outputs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. A qualitative analysis of the benefits and barriers of support groups for patients with brain tumours and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suzanne K ChambersGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Cancer Council Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University , Perth, WA , Australia ; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia , Sydney, NSW , Australia ; Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.
Luigi GrassiInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara , Ferrara , Italy.
Melissa K HydeGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Cancer Council Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.
Jimmie HollandMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY , USA.
Jeff DunnGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Cancer Council Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; School of Medicine, Griffith University , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; School of Social Science, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 256,000 cases of malignant brain and nervous system cancer were diagnosed worldwide during 2012 and 189,000 deaths, with this burden falling more heavily in the developed world. Problematically, research describing the psychosocial needs of people with brain tumors and their carers and the development and evaluation of intervention models has lagged behind that of more common cancers. This may relate, at least in part, to poor survival outcomes and high morbidity associated with this illness, and stigma about this disease. The evidence base for the benefits of psychosocial care in oncology has supported the production of clinical practice guidelines across the globe over the past decade, with a recent mandate to integrate the psychosocial domain and measurement of distress into routine care. Clinical care guidelines for people with brain tumors have emerged, with a building focus on psychosocial and survivorship care. However, researchers will need to work intensively with health care providers to ensure future practice is evidence-based and able to be implemented across both acute and community settings and likely within existing resources.

Indexed as

brain tumoursdistressneuro-oncologypsychosocial caresurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID25756038
PMCPMC4337368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.