Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25755836›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2015

Gene methylation profiles as prognostic markers in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid adenocarcinomas.

Chi-An Chen, Ying-Cheng Chiang, Ming-Cheng Chang, Yu-Hao Hu, San-Lin You, Yeu-Yao Kevin Cheng, Cheng-Yang Chou, Wen-Fang Cheng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. PMEnvironmental health and preventive medicine · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chi-An ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan.
Ying-Cheng ChiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan ; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Cheng ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Hao HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan.
San-Lin YouDepartment of Public Health, Fu-Jen Catholic University New Taipei, City, Taiwan.
Yeu-Yao Kevin ChengDepartment of Pharmacology, McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cheng-Yang ChouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Cheng-Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Wen-Fang ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan ; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan ; Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a cancer of high mortality. Aberrant gene methylation of tumor suppressor genes has been shown to be related to the development of malignancy. This study aimed to investigate the methylation of various genes in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (OCCA) and ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma (OEA) and evaluate methylation biomarkers in terms of patient chemo-response and outcome. Eight candidate genes from 66 OCCA and 51 OEA patients were evaluated by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis. Clinico-pathological parameters and patient outcomes were analyzed. The frequencies of gene methylation in RASSF1A (79% vs. 59%, p=0.025), E-cadherin (30% vs. 10%, p=0.011), and DLEC1 (71% vs. 43%, p=0.003) were higher in the patients with OCCA than in those with OEA. The chemo-resistant group had a significantly higher percentage of E-cadherin methylation (36.7% vs. 16.1%, p=0.036) than the chemo-sensitive group. In multivariate analysis (log-rank test), advanced stage (4.79 [2.10-10.94], p<0.001) was the only risk factor for mortality. Those with methylation of more than two out of three genes (E-cadherin, DLEC1, and SFRP5) had a shorter disease-free survival (1.89 [1.07-3.32], p=0.028) and overall survival (3.29 [1.57-6.87], p=0.002) than those with methylation of one or no gene. In advanced-stage malignancies, those with more than two out of the three gene methylations also had a shorter overall survival (3.86 [1.63-9.09], p=0.002) than those with methylation of only one or no gene. Patients with OCCA have different patterns of gene methylation than those with OEA. Methylation of the E-cadherin, DLEC1 and SFRP5 genes can be a prognostic biomarker for OCCA and OEA.

Indexed as

DLEC1E-cadherinmethylationovarian clear cell adenocarcinomaovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomaRASSF1ASFRP5

Identifiers

PMID25755836
PMCPMC4346531
OpenAlexW13212225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.