Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25755763›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

CD44v6 expression in patients with stage II or stage III sporadic colorectal cancer is superior to CD44 expression for predicting progression.

L H Zhao, Q L Lin, J Wei, Y L Huai, K J Wang, H Y Yan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L H ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital 1 Gao Jing Jia, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Q L LinDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital 1 Gao Jing Jia, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100123, China.
J WeiDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital 1 Gao Jing Jia, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Y L HuaiDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital 1 Gao Jing Jia, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100123, China.
K J WangDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital 1 Gao Jing Jia, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100123, China.
H Y YanDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital 1 Gao Jing Jia, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, it is difficult to predict the prognosis of patients exhibiting stage II or stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) and to identify those patients most likely to benefit from aggressive treatment. The current study was performed to examine the clinicopathological significance of CD44 and CD44v6 protein expression in these patients. STUDY

designWe retrospectively investigated 187 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with curative intent for stage II to III CRC from 2007 to 2013 in the Beijing Civil Aviation Hospital. CD44 and CD44v6 protein expression levels were determined using immunohistochemistry and compared to the clinicopathological data.

resultsUsing immunohistochemical detection, CD44 expression was observed in 108 (57.75%) of the CRC patients; and its detection was significantly associated with greater invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, angiolymphatic invasion, and a more advanced pathological tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) stage. CD44v6 expression was observed in 135 (72.19%) of the CRC patients; and its expression was significantly associated with a poorly differentiated histology, greater invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, angiolymphatic invasion, and a more advanced pathological TNM stage. Expression of CD44v6 was higher than that of CD44 in stage II and stage III sporadic CRC.

conclusionCD44v6 is a more useful marker for predicting a poor prognosis in stage II and stage III sporadic CRC as compared to CD44.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProtein IsoformsBiomarkers, TumorCD44 protein, humanCD44v6 antigenHyaluronan ReceptorsProtein IsoformsCD44CD44V6colorectal cancerimmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID25755763
PMCPMC4348888
OpenAlexW2419124509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.