Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25755650›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2015

Podocytes … What's Under Yours? (Podocytes and Foot Processes and How They Change in Nephropathy).

Chris R Neal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Aging and chronic high-fat feeding negatively affect kidney size, function, and gene expression in CTRP1-deficient mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The formin INF2 in disease: progress from 10 years of research.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Research advances in the protective effect of all-trans retinoic acid against podocyte injury].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  19. Editorial: Podocyte Pathology and Nephropathy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris R NealBristol Renal, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the described structures of podocytes in health and disease have been inferred from light and electron microscopic studies of rodent models. The variation in filtration barrier features is measured on micrographs, the aim being statistical significance. This is the technical campaign waged against kidney disease but this approach can be misleading. The signaling cascades and connectivity of the podocyte and foot processes (FPs) are inferred from in vitro studies that at best blurr the reality of the in vivo state. This review will outline actin signaling connectivity and the key differences in the structural and functional domains squeezed into the FPs and the relationship of these domains to other parts of the podocyte. It covers the changes in podocytes during nephropathy concentrating on FP and finally proposes an alternative interpretation of FP ultrastructure derived from articles published over the last 60 years.

Indexed as

actin cytoskeletonglomerular filtration barriernephropathypodocyte cytoskeletonpodocyte foot processessubpodocyte space

Identifiers

PMID25755650
PMCPMC4337384
OpenAlexW2061016207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.