Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25755638›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2015

Stimulus information stored in lasting active and hidden network states is destroyed by network bursts.

Mark R Dranias, M Brandon Westover, Sidney Cash, Antonius M J VanDongen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurocomputational Models of Interval and Pattern Timing.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Spatiotemporal memory is an intrinsic property of networks of dissociated cortical neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark R DraniasVanDongen Laboratory, Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore.
M Brandon WestoverMassachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, USA ; Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Sidney CashMassachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, USA ; Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Antonius M J VanDongenVanDongen Laboratory, Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In both humans and animals brief synchronizing bursts of epileptiform activity known as interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) can, even in the absence of overt seizures, cause transient cognitive impairments (TCI) that include problems with perception or short-term memory. While no evidence from single units is available, it has been assumed that IEDs destroy information represented in neuronal networks. Cultured neuronal networks are a model for generic cortical microcircuits, and their spontaneous activity is characterized by the presence of synchronized network bursts (SNBs), which share a number of properties with IEDs, including the high degree of synchronization and their spontaneous occurrence in the absence of an external stimulus. As a model approach to understanding the processes underlying IEDs, optogenetic stimulation and multielectrode array (MEA) recordings of cultured neuronal networks were used to study whether stimulus information represented in these networks survives SNBs. When such networks are optically stimulated they encode and maintain stimulus information for as long as one second. Experiments involved recording the network response to a single stimulus and trials where two different stimuli were presented sequentially, akin to a paired pulse trial. We broke the sequential stimulus trials into encoding, delay and readout phases and found that regardless of which phase the SNB occurs, stimulus-specific information was impaired. SNBs were observed to increase the mean network firing rate, but this did not translate monotonically into increases in network entropy. It was found that the more excitable a network, the more stereotyped its response was during a network burst. These measurements speak to whether SNBs are capable of transmitting information in addition to blocking it. These results are consistent with previous reports and provide baseline predictions concerning the neural mechanisms by which IEDs might cause TCI.

Indexed as

epilepsyinterictal spikeMultielectrode array (MEA)network excitabilityoptogeneticsstimulus memorytransient cognitive impairment (TCI)

Identifiers

PMID25755638
PMCPMC4337383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.