ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2015
Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture.
Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gaze Tracking of Pitched Balls in Coupled and Uncoupled Tasks.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Visuomotor Interception.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Interception of visible and occluded ballistic trajectories: differential contributions by areas MT/V5, V6, V6A and the vestibular premotor cortex evaluated by TMS.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictive interception across speed profiles.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
- Quantifying tracking quality during occlusion with an integrated gaze metric anchored to task performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictable motion is progressively extrapolated across temporally distinct processing stages in the human visual cortex.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Differences in predictive and prospective control strategies by batting skill level during an interception task.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Rapid eye and hand responses in an interception task are differentially modulated by context-dependent predictability.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Prediction of time to contact under perceptual and contextual uncertainties.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Motion duration is overestimated behind an occluder in action and perception tasks.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Hand movements influence the perception of time in a prediction motion task.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Interception of vertically approaching objects: temporal recruitment of the internal model of gravity and contribution of optical information.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Atypical visual motion prediction abilities in autism spectrum disorder.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021Article
- Influence of path curvature on collision avoidance behaviour between two walkers.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Visuomotor Interactions and Perceptual Judgments in Virtual Reality Simulating Different Levels of Gravity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- The role of cortical areas hMT/V5+ and TPJ on the magnitude of representational momentum and representational gravity: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Earth-Gravity Congruent Motion Facilitates Ocular Control for Pursuit of Parabolic Trajectories.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The common rate control account of prediction motion.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2018Review
- Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A remarkable challenge our brain must face constantly when interacting with the environment is represented by ambiguous and, at times, even missing sensory information. This is particularly compelling for visual information, being the main sensory system we rely upon to gather cues about the external world. It is not uncommon, for example, that objects catching our attention may disappear temporarily from view, occluded by visual obstacles in the foreground. Nevertheless, we are often able to keep our gaze on them throughout the occlusion or even catch them on the fly in the face of the transient lack of visual motion information. This implies that the brain can fill the gaps of missing sensory information by extrapolating the object motion through the occlusion. In recent years, much experimental evidence has been accumulated that both perceptual and motor processes exploit visual motion extrapolation mechanisms. Moreover, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies have identified brain regions potentially involved in the predictive representation of the occluded target motion. Within this framework, ocular pursuit and manual interceptive behavior have proven to be useful experimental models for investigating visual extrapolation mechanisms. Studies in these fields have pointed out that visual motion extrapolation processes depend on manifold information related to short-term memory representations of the target motion before the occlusion, as well as to longer term representations derived from previous experience with the environment. We will review recent oculomotor and manual interception literature to provide up-to-date views on the neurophysiological underpinnings of visual motion extrapolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.