ArticleBMC anesthesiology2015
Tromboelastography: variability and relation to conventional coagulation test in non-bleeding intensive care unit patients.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation Between Thromboelastography and Standard Coagulation Tests at a Tertiary Community Hospital.Cureus · 2025Article
- Salvianolic acid A alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation by inhibiting complement activation.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2022Article
- Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of trauma-induced hypercoagulopathy.Military Medical Research · 2021Article
- Hypocoagulable Tendency on Thromboelastometry Associated With Severity and Anticoagulation Timing in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Thromboelastography Profiles of Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- Assessment of hypercoagulability using thromboelastography predicts advanced status in renal cell carcinoma.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Establishment of the Normal Reference Range of Thrombelastogram among the Healthy Population and Pregnants in China.Iranian journal of public health · 2019Article
- Thromboelastometry profile in critically ill patients: A single-center, retrospective, observational study.PloS one · 2018Observational
- Expert consensus on the perioperative management of patients with sepsis.World journal of emergency medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) patients usually have abnormal biochemical and hematological laboratory test results as a consequence of organ dysfunction and underlying disease. Thromboelastography (TEG®) is a point-of-care laboratory analysis that gives an overview of several aspects of the coagulation process. In order to be able to perform a clinical interpretation of abnormal TEG® results the expected values from non-bleeding ICU patients should be known. The aim of this study is to report the normal variability observed in non-bleeding, non-transfused ICU patients.
methodsAdult ICU patients without bleeding in the last 24 hours, who had not received blood products within the last 24 hours, with no hematological diseases and no anticoagulation therapeutic treatment were included. Standard clinical chemistry tests, coagulation tests and TEG® were obtained. All results were reported in relation to standard reference values. TEG® values were compared with routine coagulation measurement using Spearman correlations.
resultsWe observed that the normal variability observed in non-bleeding, non-transfused ICU patients in this study included abnormally high TEG® values for maximum amplitude (MA) (73%). None of the patients showed MA results corresponding to hypocoagulability. Other coagulation tests were also changed with elevated D-Dimer, fibrinogen and APTT values, and a low ATIII value.
conclusionIn unselected ICU patients without bleeding or known factors that influence coagulation, a TEG® value of MA is often elevated suggesting hypercoagulability. This finding should be considered when interpreting TEG® observations obtained in ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.