Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25755253›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

Responses of Arabidopsis and wheat to rising CO2 depend on nitrogen source and nighttime CO2 levels.

Jose Salvador Rubio Asensio, Shimon Rachmilevitch, Arnold J Bloom

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. COPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects of Increasing COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Impacts of Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Short photoperiod attenuates COPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Elevated COThe ISME journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. COPlanta · 2019
    Article
  17. Increased temperatures and elevated COScientific reports · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose Salvador Rubio AsensioDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2813-601X
Shimon RachmilevitchDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Arnold J BloomDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 ajbloom@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6006-1495
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major contributor to the global carbon cycle is plant respiration. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations may either accelerate or decelerate plant respiration for reasons that have been uncertain. We recently established that elevated CO2 during the daytime decreases plant mitochondrial respiration in the light and protein concentration because CO2 slows the daytime conversion of nitrate (NO3 (-)) into protein. This derives in part from the inhibitory effect of CO2 on photorespiration and the dependence of shoot NO3 (-) assimilation on photorespiration. Elevated CO2 also inhibits the translocation of nitrite into the chloroplast, a response that influences shoot NO3 (-) assimilation during both day and night. Here, we exposed Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants to daytime or nighttime elevated CO2 and supplied them with NO3 (-) or ammonium as a sole nitrogen (N) source. Six independent measures (plant biomass, shoot NO3 (-), shoot organic N, (15)N isotope fractionation, (15)NO3 (-) assimilation, and the ratio of shoot CO2 evolution to O2 consumption) indicated that elevated CO2 at night slowed NO3 (-) assimilation and thus decreased dark respiration in the plants reliant on NO3 (-). These results provide a straightforward explanation for the diverse responses of plants to elevated CO2 at night and suggest that soil N source will have an increasing influence on the capacity of plants to mitigate human greenhouse gas emissions.

Indexed as

DarknessAmmonium CompoundsAnalysis of VarianceArabidopsisBiomassCarbon DioxideCell RespirationGlucoseNitratesNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesStarchSucroseTriticumAmmonium CompoundsCarbon DioxideGlucoseNitratesNitrogenNitrogen IsotopesStarchSucrose

Identifiers

PMID25755253
PMCPMC4424024
OpenAlexW2043164121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.