ArticleFamilial cancer2015
Genetic screening in patients with Retinoblastoma in Israel.
Article in Familial cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic profiling identifies actionable DNA-repair defects in a new cervical cancer model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Expanding the RB1 variant landscape of heritable retinoblastoma: unlocking precision oncology potential in Southern Africa.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- The Role of RB1 and Secondary Genomic Changes in the Development of Spindle Cell and Pleomorphic Lipomas.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2025Article
- Tumor heterogeneity in retinoblastoma: a literature review.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Impact of RB1 gene screening from blood collected on a single day from 411 family members of 113 Retinoblastoma survivors in India.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Prenatal Diagnosis of Retinoblastomas: A Scoping Review.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Five novel RB1 gene mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in Chinese children with retinoblastoma.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Retinoblastoma genetics screening and clinical management.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- The RB1 Mutation Spectrum and Genetic Management Consultation in Pediatric Patients with Retinoblastoma in Beijing, China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Spectrum of germline mutations in RB1 in Chinese patients with retinoblastoma: Application of targeted next-generation sequencing.Molecular vision · 2021Article
- Spectrum ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Molecular evidence of human papillomaviruses in the retinoblastoma tumor.Virusdisease · 2019Article
- Mutation spectrum of RB1 mutations in retinoblastoma cases from Singapore with implications for genetic management and counselling.PloS one · 2017Article
- A LINE-1 mediated deletion resulting in germline retinoblastoma predisposition.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinoblastoma (Rb) is a childhood tumor (~1 in 20,000 live births) developing in the retina due to mutations in the RB1 gene. Identification of the oncogenic mutations in the RB1 gene is important for the clinical management and for genetic counseling to families with a child or a parent affected with the tumor. Here we present our experience in detecting the pathogenic mutations in blood samples, from 150 unrelated Rb patients and highlight the relevant counseling issues. Mutation screening in the RB1 gene was based on Sanger sequencing, mosaicism of recurrent CpG transition mutations was detected by allele specific PCR and multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification for detecting of large deletions/duplications. The overall detection rate of mutations in our cohort was 55% (82/150). In the familial cases it was 100% (17/17), in bilateral and unilateral-multifocal sporadic cases 91% (50/55), and in the unilateral sporadic cases 19% (15/78). Nonsense mutations and small deletions or insertions that results in transcripts with premature termination codons that are subject to nonsense mediated decay were the most frequent, detected in 50/82 (61%) of the patients. The rest were large deletions detected in 14/82 (17%), splice site mutations detected in 11/82 (13%), missense mutations in four patients and mutations in the promoter sequence in three patients. Mutation mosaicism ranging from 10 to 30% was detected by allele specific PCR in ten patients, 9% (5/55) of patients with bilateral tumor and 33% (5/15) of the patients with unilateral tumor. In three patients rare variants were detected as the only finding which was also detected in other healthy family members. Allele specific amplification of recurrent mutations raises in our cohort the identification rate from 82 to 91% in the sporadic bilateral cases and from 13 to 19% in the unilateral sporadic cases. Most mosaic cases could not be identified by Sanger sequencing and therefore screening for recurrent CpG transition mutations by allele specific amplification is of utmost importance. Molecular screening is important for the genetic counseling regarding the risk for tumor development and the relevance for prenatal diagnosis but in several families is accompanied by detecting rare variants that might be rare polymorphisms or low penetrant mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.