Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25754716›Full record

ReviewThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice

Biologics in asthma--the next step toward personalized treatment.

Jared Darveaux, William W Busse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Better Way to Breathe: Combining Allergy and Pulmonary Care Into One Clinic.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  7. Pharmacometabolomics of Asthma as a Road Map to Precision Medicine.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pediatric asthma: An unmet need for more effective, focused treatments.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2019
    Review
  15. How does race and ethnicity effect the precision treatment of asthma?Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Translational research in pediatric pulmonary disease, 2017.Clinical and translational medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jared DarveauxDepartment of Medicine, Section of Allergy Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis.
William W BusseDepartment of Medicine, Section of Allergy Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis. Electronic address: wwb@medicine.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Inner-City Asthma Consortium-266025496-266025496N01AI025496 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN · PI BUSSE, WILLIAM · 2002 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900052CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000052INIAID NIH HHS N01 AI025496NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-25482NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-25496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is a multifaceted disease and is associated with significant impairment and risk, and a therapeutic response that is highly variable. Although current treatments are usually effective for patients with mild-to-moderate disease, patients with more severe asthma are often unresponsive to current efforts, and there remains a need for agents with properties that may achieve control in these individuals. There is ongoing research to identify bioactive molecules that contribute to the pathophysiology of asthma, and many of these have been identified as potential therapeutic targets to improve control of this disease. As a consequence of these efforts, monoclonal antibodies have been developed and tested as to their effectiveness in the treatment of asthma. The assessment of these new treatments has identified particular pathways that, in selected patients, have shown benefit. The following review will discuss the current and future use of biological agents for the treatment of asthma, their efficacy, and how certain patient phenotypes and endotypes may be associated with biomarkers that may be used to select treatments to achieve greatest effectiveness of their use. As knowledge of the effects of these biological agents in asthma emerges, as well as the patients in whom they are most beneficial, the movement toward personalized treatment will follow.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiological ProductsHumansPrecision MedicineAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiological ProductsAsthmaBiologicsTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID25754716
PMCPMC4774509
OpenAlexW2087055962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.