Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25754680›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2015

Fertility after young-onset colorectal cancer: a study of subjects with Lynch syndrome.

D Stupart, A K Win, I M Winship, M Jenkins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Male Fertility as a Proxy for Health.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Interplay between male gonadal function and overall male health.Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Young-onset colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Overlooked Long-Term Complications of Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D StupartDepartment of Surgery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
A K WinCentre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
I M WinshipGenetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
M JenkinsCentre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUDeakin University · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: AustralasiaU24CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2008 to 2011
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS U24 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInfertility is a concern for young survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC), but this risk is not well quantified. Carriers of mismatch repair (MMR) mutations are a useful cohort for studying fertility after CRC as they commonly develop CRC when young, and unaffected family members provide demographically similar controls. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of CRC on fertility in a large cohort of MMR mutation carriers.

methodMismatch repair mutation carriers identified from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry were included. For each year of life within the fertile age range (15-49), the number of living individuals and the number of children born to them were determined. Individuals were grouped by whether or not they had had a diagnosis of CRC by that age. Age-specific and total fertility rates were calculated.

resultsWe identified 1068 subjects (611 women and 457 men), of whom 467 were diagnosed with CRC. There were 1192 births during 18 674 person-years of follow-up to the women and 814 births during 14 013 person-years of follow-up to the men. The total fertility rate was decreased in women after a diagnosis of CRC compared with those who did not have CRC (1.3 vs 2.2; P = 0.0011), but age-specific fertility was only reduced in the 20-24-year age group. In men the total fertility rate was similar for both groups (2.0 vs 1.8; P = 0.27).

conclusionAge-specific fertility was decreased in female CRC survivors with Lynch syndrome aged 20-24, but not in older women or in men.

Indexed as

Birth RateAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAustraliaCase-Control StudiesColonic NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsSex FactorsYoung Adultcolorectal cancerFertilitylynch syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25754680
PMCPMC4766107
OpenAlexW2061693937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.