Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25754635›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Brain regeneration in Drosophila involves comparison of neuronal fitness.

Eduardo Moreno, Yuniel Fernandez-Marrero, Patricia Meyer, Christa Rhiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Imaging Cell Competition in Ex-VivoMethods and protocols · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Azot expression in theCommunicative & integrative biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Modeling Neurodegenerative Disorders inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Model systems for regeneration:Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eduardo MorenoInstitute of Cell Biology (IZB), University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Yuniel Fernandez-MarreroInstitute of Cell Biology (IZB), University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Patricia MeyerInstitute of Cell Biology (IZB), University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
Christa RhinerInstitute of Cell Biology (IZB), University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland. Electronic address: christa.rhiner@izb.unibe.ch.

Funding

European Research Council 614964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Darwinian-like cell selection has been studied during development and cancer [1-11]. Cell selection is often mediated by direct intercellular comparison of cell fitness, using "fitness fingerprints" [12-14]. In Drosophila, cells compare their fitness via several isoforms of the transmembrane protein Flower [12, 13]. Here, we studied the role of intercellular fitness comparisons during regeneration. Regeneration-competent organisms are traditionally injured by amputation [15, 16], whereas in clinically relevant injuries such as local ischemia or traumatic injury, damaged tissue remains within the organ [17-19]. We reasoned that "Darwinian" interactions between old and newly formed tissues may be important in the elimination of damaged cells. We used a model of adult brain regeneration in Drosophila in which mechanical puncture activates regenerative neurogenesis based on damage-responsive stem cells [20]. We found that apoptosis after brain injury occurs in damage-exposed tissue located adjacent to zones of de novo neurogenesis. Injury-affected neurons start to express isoforms of the Flower cell fitness indicator protein not found on intact neurons. We show that this change in the neuronal fitness fingerprint is required to recognize and eliminate such neurons. Moreover, apoptosis is inhibited if all neurons express "low-fitness" markers, showing that the availability of new and healthy cells drives tissue replacement. In summary, we found that elimination of impaired tissue during brain regeneration requires comparison of neuronal fitness and that tissue replacement after brain damage is coordinated by injury-modulated fitness fingerprints. Intercellular fitness comparisons between old and newly formed tissues could be a general mechanism of regenerative tissue replacement.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessRegenerationAnimalsApoptosisBrainBrain InjuriesDrosophilaNeurons

Identifiers

PMID25754635
PMCPMC4386028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.