Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25754404›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2015

Unravelling rootstock×scion interactions to improve food security.

Alfonso Albacete, Cristina Martínez-Andújar, Ascensión Martínez-Pérez, Andrew J Thompson, Ian C Dodd, Francisco Pérez-Alfocea

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
26.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfonso AlbaceteDepartamento de Nutrición Vegetal, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 25, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.
Cristina Martínez-AndújarDepartamento de Nutrición Vegetal, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 25, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.
Ascensión Martínez-PérezDepartamento de Nutrición Vegetal, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 25, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.
Andrew J ThompsonSchool of Energy, Environment and Agrifood, Cranfield University, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK.
Ian C DoddLancaster Environment Centre, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.
Francisco Pérez-AlfoceaDepartamento de Nutrición Vegetal, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 25, E-30100 Murcia, Spain alfocea@cebas.csic.es.
Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura · ESCranfield University · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While much recent science has focused on understanding and exploiting root traits as new opportunities for crop improvement, the use of rootstocks has enhanced productivity of woody perennial crops for centuries. Grafting of vegetable crops has developed very quickly in the last 50 years, mainly to induce shoot vigour and to overcome soil-borne diseases in solanaceous and cucurbitaceous crops. In most cases, such progress has largely been due to empirical interactions between farmers, gardeners, and botanists, with limited insights into the underlying physiological mechanisms. Only during the last 20 years has science realized the potential of this old activity and studied the physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in rootstock×scion interactions, thereby not only explaining old phenomena but also developing new tools for crop improvement. Rootstocks can contribute to food security by: (i) increasing the yield potential of elite varieties; (ii) closing the yield gap under suboptimal growing conditions; (iii) decreasing the amount of chemical (pesticides and fertilizers) contaminants in the soil; (iv) increasing the efficiency of use of natural (water and soil) resources; (v) generating new useful genotypic variability (via epigenetics); and (vi) creating new products with improved quality. The potential of grafting is as broad as the genetic variability able to cross a potential incompatibility barrier between the rootstock and the scion. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying the phenotypic variability resulting from rootstock×scion×environment interactions will certainly contribute to developing and exploiting rootstocks for food security.

Indexed as

Food SupplyCrops, AgriculturalGene SilencingPlant BreedingPlant RootsEpigeneticsgraft-mobile signalsmicroRNAsphytohormonestransgraftingvigour.

Identifiers

PMID25754404
PMCPMC4986720
OpenAlexW2135909053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.