Response to Robinson et al.

E Skafidas, R Testa, D Zantomio, G Chana, I P Everall, C Pantelis

Abstract readLetterComment

In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E Skafidas1] Centre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia [2] Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

R Testa1] Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia [2] Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

D ZantomioDepartment of Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.

G Chana1] Centre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia [2] Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

I P Everall1] Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia [2] Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia [3] NorthWestern Mental Health, Melbourne Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

C Pantelis1] Florey Institute of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia [2] Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia [3] Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia [4] NorthWestern Mental Health, Melbourne Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000000295650238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25754086

DOI10.1038/mp.2015.15

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.