ArticleNucleic acids research2015
Malleable nature of mRNA-protein compositional complementarity and its functional significance.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compositional complementarity between genomic RNA and coat proteins in positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Physicochemical Foundations of Life that Direct Evolution: Chance and Natural Selection are not Evolutionary Driving Forces.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- RNA-protein interactions in an unstructured context.FEBS letters · 2018Review
- mRNA/protein sequence complementarity and its determinants: The impact of affinity scales.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- The progene hypothesis: the nucleoprotein world and how life began.Biology direct · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has recently been demonstrated that nucleobase-density profiles of typical mRNA coding sequences exhibit a complementary relationship with nucleobase-interaction propensity profiles of their cognate protein sequences. This finding supports the idea that the genetic code developed in response to direct binding interactions between amino acids and appropriate nucleobases, but also suggests that present-day mRNAs and their cognate proteins may be physicochemically complementary to each other and bind. Here, we computationally recode complete Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, Escherichia coli and Homo sapiens mRNA transcriptomes and analyze how much complementary matching of synonymous mRNAs can vary, while keeping protein sequences fixed. We show that for most proteins there exist cognate mRNAs that improve, but also significantly worsen the level of native matching (e.g. by 1.8 viz. 7.6 standard deviations on average for H. sapiens, respectively), with the least malleable proteins in this sense being strongly enriched in nuclear localization and DNA-binding functions. Even so, we show that the majority of recodings for most proteins result in pronounced complementarity. Our results suggest that the genetic code was designed for favorable, yet tunable compositional complementarity between mRNAs and their cognate proteins, supporting the hypothesis that the interactions between the two were an important defining element behind the code's origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.