Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25753614›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016

Quantitative assessment of amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging with extrapolated semi-solid magnetization transfer reference (EMR) signals: Application to a rat glioma model at 4.7 Tesla.

Hye-Young Heo, Yi Zhang, Dong-Hoon Lee, Xiaohua Hong, Jinyuan Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hye-Young HeoDivison of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yi ZhangDivison of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Dong-Hoon LeeDivison of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Xiaohua HongDivison of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jinyuan ZhouDivison of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Amide Proton Transfer (APT) MRI of Brain Tumors at 3T and 7TR01EB009731 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2009 to 2016
$2.9M
Academic-Industrial Partnership to Develop Clinical Brain Cancer ImagingR01CA166171 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM, ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
US-China Collaborative Research on Stroke ImagingR01NS083435 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2013 to 2015
$588k
Molecular MRI of Radiation Necrosis in Preclinical ModelsR21EB015555 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2012 to 2013
$447k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166171NCI NIH HHS R01CA166171NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009731NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB009731NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015555NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB015555NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083435NINDS NIH HHS R01NS083435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) contributions to in vivo chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI signals in tumors. THEORY AND

methodsTwo-pool (free water and semi-solid protons) and four-pool (free water, semi-solid, amide, and upfield NOE-related protons) tissue models combined with the super-Lorentzian lineshape for semi-solid protons were used to fit wide and narrow frequency-offset magnetization-transfer (MT) data, respectively. Extrapolated semi-solid MT signals at 3.5 and -3.5 ppm from water were used as reference signals to quantify APT and NOE, respectively. Six glioma-bearing rats were scanned at 4.7 Tesla. Quantitative APT and NOE signals were compared at three saturation power levels.

resultsThe observed APT signals were significantly higher in the tumor (center and rim) than in the contralateral normal brain tissue at all saturation powers, and were the major contributor to the APT-weighted image contrast (based on MT asymmetry analysis) between the tumor and the normal brain tissue. The NOE (a positive confounding factor) enhanced this APT-weighted image contrast. The fitted amide pool sizes were significantly larger, while the NOE-related pool sizes were significantly smaller in the tumor than in the normal brain tissue.

conclusionThe extrapolated semi-solid magnetization transfer reference provides a relatively accurate approach for quantitatively measuring pure APT and NOE signals.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmidesAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProtonsRatsRats, Inbred F344Sensitivity and SpecificityAmidesBiomarkers, TumorProtonsAPTbrain tumorCESTMTNOE

Identifiers

PMID25753614
PMCPMC4561043
OpenAlexW1782573808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.