Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25753467›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Task analysis of information technology-mediated medication management in outpatient care.

F van Stiphout, J E F Zwart-van Rijkom, L A Maggio, J E C M Aarts, D W Bates, T van Gelder, P A F Jansen, J M C Schraagen, A C G Egberts, E W M T ter Braak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

F van StiphoutDepartment of Internal Medicine & Centre for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J E F Zwart-van RijkomDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L A MaggioLane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
J E C M AartsInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
D W BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
T van GelderDepartments of Hospital Pharmacy and Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
P A F JansenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J M C SchraagenTNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research Earth, Life, and Social Sciences, Soesterberg, the Netherlands.
A C G EgbertsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
E W M T ter BraakDepartment of Internal Medicine & Centre for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USErasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLPharmo Institute · NLStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEducating physicians in the procedural as well as cognitive skills of information technology (IT)-mediated medication management could be one of the missing links for the improvement of patient safety. We aimed to compose a framework of tasks that need to be addressed to optimize medication management in outpatient care.

methodsFormal task analysis: decomposition of a complex task into a set of subtasks. First, we obtained a general description of the medication management process from exploratory interviews. Secondly, we interviewed experts in-depth to further define tasks and subtasks.

settingOutpatient care in different fields of medicine in six teaching and academic medical centres in the Netherlands and the United States.

participants20 experts. Tasks were divided up into procedural, cognitive and macrocognitive tasks and categorized into the three components of dynamic decision making.

resultsThe medication management process consists of three components: (i) reviewing the medication situation; (ii) composing a treatment plan; and (iii) accomplishing and communicating a treatment and surveillance plan. Subtasks include multiple cognitive tasks such as composing a list of current medications and evaluating the reliability of sources, and procedural tasks such as documenting current medication. The identified macrocognitive tasks were: planning, integration of IT in workflow, managing uncertainties and responsibilities, and problem detection.

conclusionsAll identified procedural, cognitive and macrocognitive skills should be included when designing education for IT-mediated medication management. The resulting framework supports the design of educational interventions to improve IT-mediated medication management in outpatient care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAmbulatory Care Information SystemsMedical InformaticsMedication ErrorsMedication SystemsNetherlandsPatient Care TeamPharmacistsPhysiciansTask Performance and Analysiseducationhuman factorsITmedication managementtask analysis

Identifiers

PMID25753467
PMCPMC4574827
OpenAlexW2130058534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.