Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25753382›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2015

Immunohistochemical analysis on MMP-2 and MMP-9 for wound age determination.

Yuko Ishida, Yumi Kuninaka, Mizuho Nosaka, Akihiko Kimura, Takashi Kawaguchi, Mizuki Hama, Shoichi Sakamoto, Kouhei Shinozaki, Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Toshikazu Kondo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Longitudinal peripheral tissue RNA-Seq transcriptomic profiling, hyperalgesia, and wound healing in the rat plantar surgical incision model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mini Review: Forensic Value of Aquaporines.Frontiers in medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuko IshidaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, 641-8509, Wakayama, Japan.
Yumi Kuninaka
Mizuho Nosaka
Akihiko Kimura
Takashi Kawaguchi
Mizuki Hama
Shoichi Sakamoto
Kouhei Shinozaki
Wolfgang Eisenmenger
Toshikazu Kondo
Wakayama Medical University · JPLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed immunohistochemical study combined with morphometrical analyses in order to examine the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 using 55 human skin wounds of different ages: group I, 0-3 days (n = 16); II, 4-7 days (n = 11); III, 9-14 days (n = 16); and IV, 17-21 days (n = 12). Immunopositive reactions for MMP-2 were observed in all human skin specimens including uninjured skin as control. The number of MMP-2(+) macrophages was significantly increased in accordance with wound ages. In contrast to MMP-2, no MMP-9(+) signals were detected in uninjured and wound specimens aged less than 1 day. However, the number of MMP-9(+) macrophages profoundly appeared in groups II and III. Morphometrically, in all of wound samples aged 9-12 days, MMP-2(+) cell number was more than 20. On the contrary, most of the remaining samples had <20 positive cells. However, only one sample (a 7-day-old wound) showed 21 positive cells. Thus, with regard to practical applicability with forensic safety, MMP-2(+) macrophages of >20 would indicate a wound age of 7-12 days. Additionally, 10 out of 12 wound specimens aged 9-12 days showed the MMP-2(+) cell number of >25, implying that MMP-2(+) cell number of >25 would indicate the wound age of 9-12 days. On the contrary, all wound samples aged 3-14 days except for only one sample had MMP-9(+) cell number of >30, indicating that MMP-9(+) cell number of >30 would indicate the wound age of 3-14 days. Collectively, MMP-2 seemed to be more distinct marker, compared with MMP-9.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountChildForensic PathologyHumansImmunohistochemistryMacrophagesMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedSkinYoung AdultMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID25753382
OpenAlexW2046480364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.