Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2015
Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and impaired renal function: PrE1003, a PrECOG study.Blood cancer journal · 2018Trial
- A systematic review on the epidemiology and treatment options of multiple Myeloma in Asia.Heliyon · 2024Article
- An overview of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2022Review
- Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients with Impaired Renal Function.Current medical science · 2021Article
- [Clinical analysis of thromboembolism associated with lenalidomide-based regimens for multiple myeloma patients].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower starting doses of lenalidomide (LEN) are recommended for patients with renal impairment (RI). In the present study, we conducted a subgroup analysis of the MM-021 registration trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of LEN plus low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in Chinese patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on levels of RI. Patients received LEN+LoDEX until disease progression or discontinuation. Patients were divided according to RI: no/mild [creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥60 mL/min, n = 131], moderate (CrCl ≥30 to <60 mL/min, n = 54), and severe (CrCl <30 mL/min, n = 14). LEN starting dose was 25 mg/day on days 1-21, adjusted for baseline renal function. Best overall response rate was 48 %; in patients with no/mild, moderate, or severe RI, response rates were 50, 42, and 42 %, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were longer in patients with no/mild RI (9.3 and 22.4 months, respectively) versus those with moderate (6.9 and 16.0 months) or severe RI (4.8 and 11.1 months). LEN+LoDEX was well tolerated, although incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were higher in patients with severe RI. In Chinese patients with advanced RRMM and RI, adjusting the starting dose of LEN according to renal function did not compromise the efficacy or safety of LEN+LoDEX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.