Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25753017›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2015

Synthetic mimics of the extracellular matrix: how simple is complex enough?

Kyle A Kyburz, Kristi S Anseth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Responsive 3D Printed Microstructures Based on Collagen Folding and Unfolding.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Nanoscale Surface Chemical Patterning of Soft Polyacrylamide with Elastic Modulus Similar to Soft Tissue.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Engineering metabolism to modulate immunity.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Using biophysical cues and biomaterials to improve genetic models.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle A KyburzDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
Kristi S Anseth

Funding

Osteogenic Hydrogel Niches to Promote hMSC Migration and DifferentiationR01DE016523 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ANSETH, KRISTI S. · 2005 to 2023
$6.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016523NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE016523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells reside in a complex and dynamic extracellular matrix where they interact with a myriad of biophysical and biochemical cues that direct their function and regulate tissue homeostasis, wound repair, and even pathophysiological events. There is a desire in the biomaterials community to develop synthetic hydrogels to recapitulate facets of the ECM for in vitro culture platforms and tissue engineering applications. Advances in synthetic hydrogel design and chemistries, including user-tunable platforms, have broadened the field's understanding of the role of matrix cues in directing cellular processes and enabled the design of improved tissue engineering scaffolds. This review focuses on recent advances in the development and fabrication of hydrogels and discusses what aspects of ECM signals can be incorporated to direct cell function in different contexts.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsExtracellular MatrixHumansHydrogelsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID25753017
PMCPMC4380864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.