Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25752807›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Adverse effects reported in the use of gastroesophageal reflux disease treatments in children: a 10 years literature review.

Shlomi Cohen, Mirjam Bueno de Mesquita, Francis B Mimouni

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03014453 (Gastroesophageal Reflux Poses a Potential Risk for Late Complications of BPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03014453 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Gastroesophageal Reflux Poses a Potential Risk for Late Complications of BPD: A Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorShengjing HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled187ConditionsGastroesophageal Reflux, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shlomi CohenThe Pediatric Gastroenterology unit.
Mirjam Bueno de MesquitaThe Pediatric Gastroenterology unit.
Francis B MimouniDepartment of Pediatrics, 'Dana-Dwek' Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center and, the.
Children's Hospital & Medical Center · USSchneider Children's Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is commonly observed in children, particularly during the first year of life. Pharmacological therapy is mostly reserved for symptomatic infants diagnosed with GER disease (GERD), usually as defined in a recent consensus statement. The purpose of the present article was to review the reported adverse effects of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of paediatric GERD. We conducted this review using the electronic journal database Pubmed and Cochrane database systematic reviews using the latest 10-year period (1 January 2003 to 31 December 2012). Our search strategy included the following keywords: omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, rantidine, cimetidine, famotidine, nizatidine, domperidone, metoclopramide, betanechol, erythromycin, baclofen, alginate. We used Pubmed's own filter of: 'child: birth-18 years'. All full articles were reviewed and we only included randomized controlled trials retrieved from our search. We addressed a summary of our search on a drug-by-drug basis with regard to its mechanism of action and clinical applications, and reviewed all of the adverse effects reported and the safety profile of each drug. Adverse effects have been reported in at least 23% of patients treated with histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs) and 34% of those treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and mostly include headaches, diarrhoea, nausea (H2 RAs and PPIs) and constipation (PPIs). Acid suppression may place immune-deficient infants and children, or those with indwelling catheters, at risk for the development of lower respiratory tract infections and nosocomial sepsis. Prokinetic agents have many adverse effects, without major benefits to support their routine use.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGastroesophageal RefluxHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProton Pump InhibitorsHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump Inhibitorsantacidschildrengastroesophageal reflux diseasehistamine H2 receptor antagonistsmetoclopramideprokineticsproton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25752807
PMCPMC4541968
OpenAlexW2170601360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.