Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25752770›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2015

Prediction of O-glycosylation sites based on multi-scale composition of amino acids and feature selection.

Yuan Chen, Wei Zhou, Haiyan Wang, Zheming Yuan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan ChenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, China.
Wei Zhou
Haiyan Wang
Zheming Yuan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein glycosylation is one of the most important and complex post-translational modification that provides greater proteomic diversity than any other post-translational modification. Fast and reliable computational methods to identify glycosylation sites are in great demand. Two key issues, feature encoding and feature selection, can critically affect the accuracy of a computational method. We present a new O-glycosylation sites prediction method using only amino acid sequence information. The method includes the following components: (1) on the basis of multi-scale theory, features based on multi-scale composition of amino acids were extracted from the training sequences with identified glycosylation sites; (2) perform a two-stage feature selection to remove features that had adverse effects on the prediction, including a stage one preliminary filtering with Student's t test, and a second stage screening through iterative elimination using novel pairwise comparisons conducted in random subspace using support vector machine. Important features retained are used to build prediction model. The method is evaluated with sequence-based tenfold cross-validation tests on balanced datasets. The results of our experiments show that our method significantly outperforms those reported in the literature in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Matthew's correlation coefficient. The prediction accuracy of serine and threonine residues sites reached 95.7 and 92.7%. The Matthew correlation coefficient of our method for S and T sites is 0.914 and 0.873, respectively. This method can evaluate each feature with the interactions of the rest of the features, which are still included in the model and have the advantage of high efficiency.

Indexed as

GlycosylationAmino AcidsComputational BiologyProteinsROC CurveSequence Analysis, ProteinSupport Vector MachineAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.