Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25752682›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2015

Establishing criteria for human mesenchymal stem cell potency.

Rebekah M Samsonraj, Bina Rai, Padmapriya Sathiyanathan, Kia Joo Puan, Olaf Rötzschke, James H Hui, Michael Raghunath, Lawrence W Stanton, Victor Nurcombe, Simon M Cool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Single-cell Technology in Stem Cell Research.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Biomaterials for Cell Manufacturing.ACS macro letters · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebekah M SamsonrajGlycotherapeutics Group.
Bina RaiGlycotherapeutics Group.
Padmapriya SathiyanathanStem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore.
Kia Joo PuanSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), A*STAR, Singapore.
Olaf RötzschkeSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), A*STAR, Singapore.
James H HuiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Michael RaghunathAdvanced Wound Care Laboratory, Institute of Medical Biology, A*STAR, Singapore.
Lawrence W StantonDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Victor NurcombeGlycotherapeutics Group.
Simon M CoolGlycotherapeutics Group.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to identify critical determinants of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) potency using in vitro and in vivo attributes of cells isolated from the bone marrow of age- and sex-matched donors. Adherence to plastic was not indicative of potency, yet capacity for long-term expansion in vitro varied considerably between donors, allowing the grouping of MSCs from the donors into either those with high-growth capacity or low-growth capacity. Using this grouping strategy, high-growth capacity MSCs were smaller in size, had greater colony-forming efficiency, and had longer telomeres. Cell-surface biomarker analysis revealed that the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) criteria did not distinguish between high-growth capacity and low-growth capacity MSCs, whereas STRO-1 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha were preferentially expressed on high-growth capacity MSCs. These cells also had the highest mean expression of the mRNA transcripts TWIST-1 and DERMO-1. Irrespective of these differences, both groups of donor MSCs produced similar levels of key growth factors and cytokines involved in tissue regeneration and were capable of multilineage differentiation. However, high-growth capacity MSCs produced approximately double the volume of mineralized tissue compared to low-growth capacity MSCs when assessed for ectopic bone-forming ability. The additional phenotypic criteria presented in this study when combined with the existing ISCT minimum criteria and working proposal will permit an improved assessment of MSC potency and provide a basis for establishing the quality of MSCs prior to their therapeutic application.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCytokinesHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceWound HealingCytokinesGrowth capacityMesenchymal stem/stromal cellsPDGFR-αPotencyQualitySTRO-1

Identifiers

PMID25752682
PMCPMC5363381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.