Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25752600›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

OASes and STING: adaptive evolution in concert.

Alessandra Mozzi, Chiara Pontremoli, Diego Forni, Mario Clerici, Uberto Pozzoli, Nereo Bresolin, Rachele Cagliani, Manuela Sironi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra MozziBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Chiara PontremoliBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Diego ForniBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Mario ClericiDepartment of Physiopathology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy Don C. Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Uberto PozzoliBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Nereo BresolinBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy Department of Physiopathology and Transplantation, Dino Ferrari Centre, University of Milan, Fondazione Ca' Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Rachele CaglianiBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Manuela SironiBioinformatics, Scientific Institute IRCCS E.MEDEA, Bosisio Parini, Italy manuela.sironi@bp.lnf.it.
IRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OAS (2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthases) proteins and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS, gene symbol: MB21D1) patrol the cytoplasm for the presence of foreign nucleic acids. Upon binding to double-stranded RNA or double-stranded DNA, OAS proteins and cGAS produce nucleotide second messengers to activate RNase L and STING (stimulator of interferon genes, gene symbol: TMEM173), respectively; this leads to the initiation of antiviral responses. We analyzed the evolutionary history of the MB21D1-TMEM173 and OAS-RNASEL axes in primates and bats and found evidence of widespread positive selection in both orders. In TMEM173, residue 230, a major determinant of response to natural ligands and to mimetic drugs (e.g., DMXAA), was positively selected in Primates and Chiroptera. In both orders, selection also targeted an α-helix/loop element in RNase L that modulates the enzyme preference for single-stranded RNA versus stem loops. Analysis of positively selected sites in OAS1, OAS2, and MB21D1 revealed parallel evolution, with the corresponding residues being selected in different genes. As this cannot result from gene conversion, these data suggest that selective pressure acting on OAS and MB21D1 genes is related to nucleic acid recognition and to the specific mechanism of enzyme activation, which requires a conformational change. Finally, a population genetics-phylogenetics analysis in humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas detected several positively selected sites in most genes. Data herein shed light into species-specific differences in infection susceptibility and in response to synthetic compounds, with relevance for the design of synthetic compounds as vaccine adjuvants.

Indexed as

Evolution, Molecular2',5'-Oligoadenylate SynthetaseAnimalsChiropteraCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseEndoribonucleasesGorilla gorillaHumansMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesPan troglodytesPrimatesProtein Structure, TertiarySTING Protein2-5A-dependent ribonuclease2',5'-Oligoadenylate SynthetasecGAS protein, humanCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseEndoribonucleasesMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesOAS1 protein, humanSTING1 protein, humanSTING ProteincGASOASpositive selectionRNase LSTING

Identifiers

PMID25752600
PMCPMC4419793
OpenAlexW2153013573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.