Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25752449›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2015

A systematic review of motivational interviewing for weight loss among adults in primary care.

R D Barnes, V Ivezaj

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03091309 (Counseling to Optimize Medication Adherence in Expectant Mothers With Inflammatory Bowel Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
32.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03091309 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Counseling to Optimize Medication Adherence in Expectant Mothers With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (COACH-IBD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled220ConditionsInflammatory Bowel Diseases, Medication Adherence, Crohn Disease, Ulcerative ColitisArmsInteractive educational video, Initial in-person counseling with an IBD nurse, Motivational interviewing, Telemedicine-based follow-up, Monthly follow-up questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Coaching Through Technology: A Systematic Review into Efficacy and Effectiveness for the Ageing Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. POWERSTrials · 2017
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R D BarnesDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
V Ivezaj
Yale University · US

Funding

Examining Innovative Obesity Treatment and Related Novel ConstructsK23DK092279 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BARNES, RACHEL D · 2011 to 2015
$780k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK092279NIDDK NIH HHS K23-DK092279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a client-centred method of intervention focused on enhancing intrinsic motivation and behaviour change. A previous review of the literature and meta-analyses support the effectiveness of MI for weight loss. None of these studies, however, focused on the bourgeoning literature examining MI for weight loss among adults within primary care settings, which confers unique barriers to providing weight loss treatment. Further, the current review includes 19 studies not included in previous reviews or meta-analyses. We conducted a comprehensive review of PubMed, MI review papers, and citations from relevant papers. A total of 24 adult randomized controlled trials were identified. MI interventions typically were provided individually by a range of clinicians and compared with usual care. Few studies provided adequate information regarding MI treatment fidelity. Nine studies (37.5%) reported significant weight loss at post-treatment assessment for the MI condition compared with control groups. Thirteen studies (54.2%) reported MI patients achieving at least 5% loss of initial body weight. There is potential for MI to help primary care patients lose weight. Conclusions, however, must be drawn cautiously as more than half of the reviewed studies showed no significant weight loss compared with usual care and few reported MI treatment fidelity.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingPrimary Health CareWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPatient ComplianceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWeight Reduction ProgramsMotivational interviewingobesityprimary carereview

Identifiers

PMID25752449
PMCPMC4491487
OpenAlexW1539101774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.