Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25752314›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology2014

Emergence of Cognition from Action.

György Buzsáki, Adrien Peyrache, John Kubie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Kick-starting concept formation with intrinsically motivated learning: the grounding by competence acquisition hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Grid cells, border cells, and discrete complex analysis.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The evolution of brain architectures for predictive coding and active inference.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Neurophysiology of Remembering.Annual review of psychology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Competitive Frontoparietal Interactions Mediate Implicit Inferences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Modality general and modality specific coding of hedonic valence.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Topological Schemas of Memory Spaces.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

György BuzsákiThe Neuroscience Institute, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016 Center for Neural Science, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016 gyorgy.buzsaki@nyumc.org.
Adrien PeyracheThe Neuroscience Institute, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016.
John KubieDepartment of Cell Biology, Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York at Brooklyn, New York, New York 11203.

Funding

The Hippocampal Interneuron NetworkR01MH054671 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI BUZSAKI, GYORGY · 1997 to 2017
$5.2M
Deducing the origin and effect of extracellular electric fields in hippocampusR01NS074015 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KOCH, CHRISTOF · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Neuronal coordination in the thalamo-cortical head-direction systemK99NS086915 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEYRACHE, ADRIEN · 2014 to 2015
$180k
NIMH NIH HHS MH54671NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH054671NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS086915NINDS NIH HHS NS074015NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of brain function have evolved through multiple stages. The first proposition was that brain networks support a set of reflex responses, with current sensory inputs producing immediate motor outputs. The behaviorist paradigm suggested that actions can always be explained as a response to immediate external cues. In response to these views, the cognitive paradigm argued that behavior cannot be understood simply as input-output functions because the hidden layers of brain generate unpredictability. The central processing was termed "cognition." Here we propose a neuroscience-based model of cognition. Our core hypothesis is that cognition depends on internal models of the animal and its world, where internally generated sequences can serve to perform "what if" scenarios and anticipate the possible consequences of alternative actions without actually testing them, and aid in the decisions of overt actions. We support our hypotheses by several examples of recent experimental findings and show how externally guided cell assembly sequences become internalized to support cognitive functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehaviorCognitionHippocampusHumansMemoryNeuronsSensation

Identifiers

PMID25752314
PMCPMC4895837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.