ArticlePloS one2015
Repeatability of quantitative sodium magnetic resonance imaging for estimating pseudo-intracellular sodium concentration and pseudo-extracellular volume fraction in brain at 3 T.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Variability by region and method in human brain sodium concentrations estimated byScientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Brain Clearance of Contrast Agent in Intravenous DCE-MRI Is Measurable and Cannot Be Explained by Clearance Across the BBB Alone.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Repeatability of SimultaneousNMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration usingSkeletal radiology · 2025Article
- VirtMRI: A Tool for Teaching MRI.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
- Prediction of Cobb Angle Using Deep Learning Algorithm with Three-Dimensional Depth Sensor Considering the Influence of Garment in Idiopathic Scoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Reliability and Validity of Scoliosis Measurements Obtained with Surface Topography Techniques: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Review
- Imaging the transmembrane and transendothelial sodium gradients in gliomas.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Measuring tissue sodium concentration: Cross-vendor repeatability and reproducibility ofJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Article
- Potential of Sodium MRI as a Biomarker for Neurodegeneration and Neuroinflammation in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Automated noninvasive detection of idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: A principle validation study.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Quantitative sodium imaging and gliomas: a feasibility study.Neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Distribution of brain sodium long and short relaxation times and concentrations: a multi-echo ultra-high fieldScientific reports · 2018Article
- Review
- Dynamic phosphocreatine imaging with unlocalized pH assessment of the human lower leg muscle following exercise at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2018Article
- Multipulse sodium magnetic resonance imaging for multicompartment quantification: Proof-of-concept.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the repeatability of the quantification of pseudo-intracellular sodium concentration (C1) and pseudo-extracellular volume fraction (α) estimated in brain in vivo using sodium magnetic resonance (MRI) at 3 T. Eleven healthy subjects were scanned twice, with two sodium MRI acquisitions (with and without fluid suppression by inversion recovery), and two double inversion recovery (DIR) proton MRI. DIR MRIs were used to create masks of gray and white matter (GM, WM), that were subsequently applied to the C1 and α maps calculated from sodium MRI and a tissue three-compartment model, in order to measure the distributions of these two parameters in GM, WM or full brain (GM+WM) separately. The mean, median, mode, standard deviation (std), skewness and kurtosis of the C1 and α distributions in whole GM, WM and full brain were calculated for each subject, averaged over all data, and used as parameters for the repeatability assessment. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as a measure of reliability for the detection of intra-subject changes in C1 and αfor each parameter, while intraclass correlation (ICC) was used as a measure of repeatability. It was found that the CV of most of the parameters was around 10-20% (except for C1 kurtosis which is about 40%) for C1 and α measurements, and that ICC was moderate to very good (0.4 to 0.9) for C1 parameters and for some of the α parameters (mainly skewness and kurtosis). In conclusion, the proposed method could allow to reliably detect changes of 50% and above of the different measurement parameters of C1 and αin neuropathologies (multiple sclerosis, tumor, stroke, Alzheimer's disease) compared to healthy subjects, and that skewness and kurtosis of the distributions of C1 and αseem to be the more sensitive parameters to these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.