Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25751138›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2015

Kinetochore-microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes.

Maria Kalantzaki, Etsushi Kitamura, Tongli Zhang, Akihisa Mino, Béla Novák, Tomoyuki U Tanaka

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. RZZ-SPINDLY-DYNEIN: you got to keep 'em separated.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria KalantzakiCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Etsushi KitamuraCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Tongli ZhangOxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Akihisa MinoCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Béla NovákOxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Tomoyuki U TanakaCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
University of Dundee · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UK A6996European Research Council 322682Medical Research Council 84678Medical Research Council G0701147Wellcome Trust 083524Wellcome Trust 096535Wellcome Trust 097945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For proper chromosome segregation, sister kinetochores must interact with microtubules from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). To establish bi-orientation, aberrant kinetochore-microtubule attachments are disrupted (error correction) by aurora B kinase (Ipl1 in budding yeast). Paradoxically, during this disruption, new attachments are still formed efficiently to enable fresh attempts at bi-orientation. How this is possible remains an enigma. Here we show that kinetochore attachment to the microtubule lattice (lateral attachment) is impervious to aurora B regulation, but attachment to the microtubule plus end (end-on attachment) is disrupted by this kinase. Thus, a new lateral attachment is formed without interference, then converted to end-on attachment and released if incorrect. This process continues until bi-orientation is established and stabilized by tension across sister kinetochores. We reveal how aurora B specifically promotes disruption of the end-on attachment through phospho-regulation of kinetochore components Dam1 and Ndc80. Our results reveal fundamental mechanisms for promoting error correction for bi-orientation.

Indexed as

Aurora KinasesBinding SitesCell Cycle ProteinsChromosome SegregationKinetochoresMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMitosisMutationNuclear ProteinsProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpindle ApparatusAurora KinasesCDC6 protein, S cerevisiaeCell Cycle ProteinsDAM1 protein, S cerevisiaeIPL1 protein, S cerevisiaeMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNDC80 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25751138
PMCPMC4380510
OpenAlexW2055168854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.