Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25751120›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2015

Post-Acute Care Use and Hospital Readmission after Sepsis.

Tiffanie K Jones, Barry D Fuchs, Dylan S Small, Scott D Halpern, Asaf Hanish, Craig A Umscheid, Charles A Baillie, Meeta Prasad Kerlin, David F Gaieski, Mark E Mikkelsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03865602 (Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03865602 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Improving Morbidity During Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): A Pragmatic Randomized Evaluation of Implementing Best Practice Care for Sepsis Survivors to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled712ConditionsClinical SepsisArmsSepsis Transition And Recovery (STAR), Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Predictors of 30-day readmission in patients with bloodstream infection: a population-based cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Metabolic adaptations rewire CD4Nature immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tiffanie K Jones1 Department of Medicine.
Barry D Fuchs1 Department of Medicine.
Dylan S Small3 The Wharton School.
Scott D Halpern1 Department of Medicine.
Asaf Hanish7 Office of the Chief Medical Officer, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Craig A Umscheid1 Department of Medicine.
Charles A Baillie5 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
Meeta Prasad Kerlin1 Department of Medicine.
David F Gaieski8 Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine.
Mark E Mikkelsen1 Department of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe epidemiology of post-acute care use and hospital readmission after sepsis remains largely unknown.

objectivesTo examine the rate of post-acute care use and hospital readmission after sepsis and to examine risk factors and outcomes for hospital readmissions after sepsis.

methodsIn an observational cohort study conducted in an academic health care system (2010-2012), we compared post-acute care use at discharge and hospital readmission after 3,620 sepsis hospitalizations with 108,958 nonsepsis hospitalizations. We used three validated, claims-based approaches to identify sepsis and severe sepsis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPost-acute care use at discharge was more likely after sepsis, driven by skilled care facility placement (35.4% after sepsis vs. 15.8%; P < 0.001), with the highest rate observed after severe sepsis. Readmission rates at 7, 30, and 90 days were higher postsepsis (P < 0.001). Compared with nonsepsis hospitalizations (15.6% readmitted within 30 d), the increased readmission risk was present regardless of sepsis severity (27.3% after sepsis and 26.0-26.2% after severe sepsis). After controlling for presepsis characteristics, the readmission risk was found to be 1.51 times greater (95% CI, 1.38-1.66) than nonsepsis hospitalizations. Readmissions after sepsis were more likely to result in death or transition to hospice care (6.1% vs. 13.3% after sepsis; P < 0.001). Independent risk factors associated with 30-day readmissions after sepsis hospitalizations included age, malignancy diagnosis, hospitalizations in the year prior to the index hospitalization, nonelective index admission type, one or more procedures during the index hospitalization, and low hemoglobin and high red cell distribution width at discharge.

conclusionsPost-acute care use and hospital readmissions were common after sepsis. The increased readmission risk after sepsis was observed regardless of sepsis severity and was associated with adverse readmission outcomes.

Indexed as

SepsisAdultAgedAge FactorsCritical CareErythrocyte IndicesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMedicareMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionHemoglobinscritical careemergency department usehospital readmissioninfectionsepsis

Identifiers

PMID25751120
PMCPMC4590016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.