Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25750862›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2015

From black box to toolbox: Outlining device functionality, engagement activities, and the pervasive information architecture of mHealth interventions.

Brian G Danaher, Håvar Brendryen, John R Seeley, Milagra S Tyler, Tim Woolley

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian G DanaherOregon Research Institute, Eugene OR, USA.
Håvar BrendryenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
John R SeeleyOregon Research Institute, Eugene OR, USA.
Milagra S TylerOregon Research Institute, Eugene OR, USA.
Tim WoolleyIEQ Technology, Springfield OR, USA.

Funding

Web and Mobile Smoking Cessation InterventionsR01CA172205 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DANAHER, BRIAN G., SEELEY, JOHN R · 2013 to 2016
$2.6M
Web and Phone Intervention to Maintain Postpartum Tobacco AbstinenceR01CA140310 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DANAHER, BRIAN G., LEVINE, MICHELE D · 2011 to 2013
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140310NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mHealth interventions that deliver content via mobile phones represent a burgeoning area of health behavior change. The current paper examines two themes that can inform the underlying design of mHealth interventions: (1) mobile device functionality, which represents the technological toolbox available to intervention developers; and (2) the

Indexed as

blackboxeHealthInternet InterventionsmHealthPervasive Information Architecturetoolbox

Identifiers

PMID25750862
PMCPMC4346786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.