Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25750840›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2015

An assessment of histological margins and recurrence of melanoma in situ.

Kenneth M Joyce, Cormac W Joyce, Deirdre M Jones, Paul Donnellan, Alan J Hussey, Padraic J Regan, Jack L Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. BRAFV600E and KIT immunoexpression in early-stage melanoma.Anais brasileiros de dermatologia · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth M JoyceDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Cormac W JoyceDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Deirdre M JonesDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Paul DonnellanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Alan J HusseyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Padraic J ReganDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Jack L KellyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; Department of Oncology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland; and Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
University Hospital Galway · IEOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma in situ (MIS) accounts for up to 27% of all melanomas. MIS has no metastatic potential and the aim should be to excise the lesion completely with a clear histological margin, although margin clearance remains undefined. We aimed to assess the relation of histological excision margins of MIS to recurrence and progression to invasive disease.

methodsWe analyzed all patients with MIS excised by wide local excision or staged excision in our institution over a 5-year period from December 2008 to January 2014 using a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic details included patient demographics, anatomical site of lesion, melanoma subtype, histological excision margin, and recurrence.

resultsA total of 410 patients had MIS excised during this time, the majority of which were lentigo maligna subtype (79%). The average histological excision margin was 3.7 mm. The rate of recurrence was 2.2% (9/410), with a median follow-up of 23 months. Lentigo maligna had a similar rate of recurrence to non-lentigo MIS (2.3% vs 1.2%) (P = 0.69). The mean excision margin of those that recurred was 1.9 mm compared with an average of 3.8 mm in those that did not. The rate of recurrence of MIS with histological excision margin ≤3.00 mm was 3.8% compared with 0.5% in those with a histological margin >3.00 mm (P = 0.03). One case of MIS recurred as invasive disease.

conclusionAt institutions using wide local excision or staged excision for MIS, a histological margin of >3.0 mm is required to achieve a low recurrence rate.

Identifiers

PMID25750840
PMCPMC4350307
OpenAlexW2072320099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.