Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25750782›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2014

Predictors of colonoscopy use one year after colonoscopy: prospective study of surveillance behavior for colorectal cancer.

Toshiatsu Taniguchi, Kei Hirai, Ryoko Sumi, Noriyuki Hayashi, Kazuhisa Maeda, Toshinori Ito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshiatsu TaniguchiDepartment of Psychiatry, Tottori Seikyo Hospital , 458 Suehiroonsenn-cho, Tottori 680-0841 , Japan ; Department of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita , Osaka 565-0871 , Japan.
Kei HiraiDepartment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita , Osaka 565-0871 , Japan.
Ryoko SumiDepartment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita , Osaka 565-0871 , Japan.
Noriyuki HayashiDepartment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita , Osaka 565-0871 , Japan.
Kazuhisa MaedaDepartment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita , Osaka 565-0871 , Japan.
Toshinori ItoDepartment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita , Osaka 565-0871 , Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesized that perceived risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC worry would be the main predictors of surveillance behavior in patients undergoing colonoscopy. We therefore assessed factors predicting colonoscopy use for re-examination one year after colonoscopy. Patients who had undergone colonoscopy and were scheduled for re-examination one year later were recruited. Patients were administered questionnaires after baseline colonoscopy assessing demographic factors, perceived risk, CRC worry, cancer preventability, knowledge of CRC and results of colonoscopy. We confirmed whether participants underwent colonoscopy re-examinations one year later (follow-up). Finally, 56 participants completed the research and were used in the final analysis (response rate = 65.1%). We found that 37.5% of the participants who underwent baseline colonoscopy underwent follow-up colonoscopy one year later. Follow-up colonoscopy was not significantly associated with any psychological variables, but was significantly associated with educational status (postsecondary) (odds ratio [OR] = 7.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.83-27.56) and the results of baseline colonoscopy in patients who did not undergo polypectomy but had remaining polyps (OR = 4.26, 95% CI = 1.02-17.84). Additionally, significant differences in cancer threat-related variables were observed among groups of patients who, during baseline colonoscopy, underwent polypectomy but had no remaining polyps, had polyps removed with some polyps remaining, or did not undergo polypectomy but had remaining polyps (

Indexed as

cancer threatcolonoscopycolorectal cancerprospective studysurveillance behavior

Identifiers

PMID25750782
PMCPMC4346036
OpenAlexW2015169286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.